反杜林论PPT(思政英语第一课).ppt
《反杜林论PPT(思政英语第一课).ppt》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《反杜林论PPT(思政英语第一课).ppt(75页珍藏版)》请在三一办公上搜索。
1、Anti-Duhring反杜林论,Frederick Engels弗里德里希恩格斯,Part I:PhilosophyIX.Morality and LawEternal Truths(excerpt),Para One,If,then,we have not made much progress with truth and error,we can make even less with good and evil.This opposition manifests itself exclusively in the domain of morals,that is,a domain be
2、longing to the history of mankind,and it is precisely in this field that final and ultimate truths are most sparsely sown.(1),The conceptions of good and evil have varied so much from nation to nation and from age to age that they have often been in direct contradicton to each other.but all the same
3、(2),someone may object,good is not evil and evil is not good,if good is confused with evil,there is an end to all morality,and everyone can do as he pleases.,This is also,stripped of all oracular phrases,Herr Duhrings opinon.But the matter cannont be so simply disposed of.If it were such an easy bus
4、iness there would certainly be no dispute at all over good and evil;everyone would know what was good and what was bad.But how do things stand today?3,What morality is preached to us today?There is first Christian-feudal morality,inherited from earlier religious times;and this is divided,essentially
5、,into a Catholic and a Protestant morality,each of which has no lack of subdivisions,from the Jesuit-Catholic and Orthodox-Protestant to loose“enlightened”moralities.,Alongside theese we find the modern-bourgeois morality and beside it also the proletarian morality of the futrue,so that in the most
6、advanced European countries alone the past,present and future provide three great groups of moral theories which are in force(4)simultaneously and alongside each other.,Which,then,is the true one?Not one of them,in the sense of absolute finality;but certainly that morality contains the maximu elemen
7、ts promising permanence which,in the present,represents the overthrow of the present,represents the future,and that is proletarian morality(5).,Para Two But when we see that the three classes of modren society,the feudal aristocracy,the bourgeoisie and the proletariat,each have a morality of their o
8、wn,we can only draw one conclusion:,that men,consciously or unconsciously,derive their ethical ideas in the last resort(6)from the pracitical relations on which their class position is based From the economic relations in which they carry on production and exchange.,Para Three,But nevertheless there
9、 is a great deal which the three moral theories mentioned above have in common is this not at least a portion of a morality which is fixed once and for all(7)?these moral theories represent three different stages of the same historical development,have therefore a common historical background,and fo
10、r that reason alone they necessarily have much in common.,Even more(8),at similar or approximately similar stages of economic development moral theories must of necessity be more or less in agreement.From the moment when private ownership of movable property developed,all societies in which this pri
11、vate ownership existed had to have this moral injunction in common:Thou shalt not steal(9).,Does this injunction thereby become and eternal moral injunction?By no means.In a society in which all motives for stealing have been done away with(10),in which therefore at very most(11)only lunatics would
12、ever steal,how the preacher of morals would be laughed at who tried solemnly to proclaim the eternal truth:Thou shalt not steal(12)!,Para Four,We therefore reject every attempt to impose on us any moral dogma whatsoever as an eternl,ultimate and forever immutable ethical law on the pretext that(13)t
13、he moral world,too,has its permanent principles which stand above history and the differences between nations.,We maintain on the contrary that all moral theories have been hitherto the product,in the last analysis,of the economic conditions of society obtaining at the time.And as society has hither
14、to moved in class antagonisms,morality has always been class morality;it has either justified the domination and the interests of ruling class,or ever since the oppressed class became powerful enough,it has represented its indignation against this domination and the future interests of the oppressed
15、.,That in this process there has on the whole been progress in morality,as in all other branches of human knowledge,no one will doubt.(14)But we have not yet passed beyond class morality.A really human morality which stands above clas antagonisms and above any recollection of them becomes possible o
16、nly at a stage of society which has not only overcome class antagonisms but has even forgotten them in practical life.,And now one can gauge Herr Duhrings presumption in advancing his claim,from the midst of the old class society and on the eve of a social revolution,to impose on the future classles
17、s society and eternal morality independent of time and changes in reality.(15)Even assuming what we do not know up to now that he understands the structure of the society of the future at least in its main outlines.,X.Morality and Law Equality(excerpt),Para One,But even though we have finished with
18、Herr Duhringss shallow,botched treatment of the idea of equality,this does not mean that we have finished with the idea itself,which especially thanks to Rousseau(16法国卢梭)played a theoretical,and during and since the great revolution a practical political role,and even today still plays an important
19、agitational role in the socialist movement of almost every country.The establishment of its scientific content will also determine its value for proletarian agitation.,Para Two,The idea that all men,as men,have something in common,and that to that extent they are equal,is of course primeval.But the
20、modern demand for equality is something entirely different from that;this conssists rather in deducing from that common quality of being human,from that equality of men as men,a claim to equal political and social status for all human beings,or at least for all itizens of a state or all members of a
21、 ociety.,Before that original conception of relative equality could lead to the conclusion that men should have equal rights in the state and in society,before that conclusion could even appear to be something natural and self-evident,thousands of years had to pass and did pass.(17),In the most anci
22、ent,primitive communities,equality of rights could apply at most to members of the community;women,slaves and foreigners were excluded from this equality as a matter of course.Among the Greeks and Romans the inequlities of men were of much greater importance that their equlity in any respect.,It wou
23、ld necessarily have seemed insanity to the ancients that Greeks and barbarians,freemen and slaves,citizens and peregrines,Roman citizens and Roman subjects(to use a comprehensive term(18),should have a claim to equal political status.,Under the Roman Empire all these distinctions gradually disappear
24、ed,except the disctinction between freemen and slaves,and in this way there arose,for the freemen at least,that equlity as between private individuals on the basis of which Roman law developed(19)the most complete elaboration of law basd on private property which we know.,But so long as the antithes
25、is between freemen and slaves existed,there could be no talk of drawing legal conclusions from general equality of men;we saw this even recently,in the slave-owning states of the North Americal Union.,Para Three,Christianity knew only one point in which all men were equal:that all were equally born
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 反杜林论 PPT 英语 第一

链接地址:https://www.31ppt.com/p-6250693.html