[高等教育]大 学 英 语 四 级 考 试.doc
《[高等教育]大 学 英 语 四 级 考 试.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《[高等教育]大 学 英 语 四 级 考 试.doc(15页珍藏版)》请在三一办公上搜索。
1、大 学 英 语 四 级 考 试COLLEAGE ENGLISH TESTBand fourPart IWriting(30 minutes)Directions: For this part, you are allowed 30 minutes to write a short essay entitled The Climate Change You should write at least 120 words following the outline given below.1这些年气候变化很大。2气候变化造成了许多影响。3谈谈你的看法注意:此部分试题在答题卡1上作答。Part II
2、 Reading Comprehension (Skimming and Scanning) (15 minutes)。Directions: In this part, you will have 15 minutes to go over the passage quickly and answer the questions on Answer Sheet 1. For questions 1-7, choose the best answer from the four choices marked A), B), C) and D). For questions 8-10, comp
3、lete the sentences with the information given in the passage. So Near and Yet So Far In many examinations, 90% is an excellent score, deserving a prize and a handshake from the headmaster. In Geneva this week, only full marks would do, and the worlds trade ministers failed. No matter that they came
4、closer to a deal than anyone should have expected. No matter that they stuck at it for nine days and several nights, in the longest ministerial meeting in the history of the World Trade Organization (WTO). No matter, too, that this time they parted in stunned disbelief, heads shaking, rather than in
5、 acrimony(刻薄), quarrel and spite, as at Cancun in 2003. They managed convergence on 18 of the 20 topics set before them by Pascal Lamy, the WTOs director-general, but they stumbled on the 19th, a device for protecting farmers in developing countries against surges in imports. They never reached the
6、20th, cotton. Failed. You can construct a plausible argument that the collapse of yet another set of talks on the Doha round, which is now coming up to seven years old, is of little importance. While the worlds trade ministers have alternated between talking and not talking to one another about Doha
7、, the worlds businesspeople have carried on regardless: the growth of global commerce has outstripped the hitherto (到前为止) healthy pace of global GDP. Developing countries in particular have continued to open up to imports and foreign investment. You might say that not much was on offer in Geneva any
8、way: one study put the eventual benefits at maybe $70 billion, a drop in the ocean of the worlds GDP. Global stock markets, with so much else on their minds, either didnt notice or didnt care. On July 29th, the day the talks broke up, the S&P 500 index rose by 2.3%. Plausible, but wrong. For a start
9、, the lowish estimates of the economic benefits of the round miss out two things. One is the value of the unpredictable dynamic benefits of more open markets. Access to more customers allows exporters to exploit economies of scale. Competition encourages not only specialization, the classic result o
10、f more open trade, but also increased productivity. The other is what you might call the option value of the Doha round. The WTO inhabits a sort of parallel universe in which countries negotiate not on what tariffs and subsidies will actually be, but on maximum (or bound) rates and amounts. Although
11、 many countries have cut tariffs and farm. subsidies - if only, in the latter case, because of rising food prices - too few have turned these cuts into commitments. Tighter binding would cramp their ability to turn back to protection. It would have made up the bulk of a Doha deal.Do you care about t
12、he beans or the beings? Also on offer were benefits that are easier to visualize. Some cuts in bound tariffs would have bitten into actual rates. There would have been much less tariff escalation(增加) - a nasty practice, by which higher tariffs are levied on successive stages of production. Raw coffe
13、e beans may be tariff-free, but roasted beans incur a higher levy, and so on as they are ground, getting rid of caffeine and so forth. Move up the value chain, and you pay. Some developing countries - in Latin America, especially Brazil, and in Africa too - are seething that a deal slipped away. Giv
14、en all this, the inability of ministers to agree, having come so close, seems unfathomable(难解 ). Belief is all the more beggared when you look at the wider world. The global economy is slowing, possibly horribly: under such conditions, protectionism thrives. It would be silly to say that the sky is
15、about to fall in: too much has been agreed in the past, and too many countries and businesses value an open trading system, to suppose that the 2010s will be a rerun of the 1930s. But trade has too few friends these days - notably in Americas Congress and the Elys6e Palace. Ministers picked a poor t
16、ime to fail. The ultimate cause of failure only deepens the sense of puzzlement. When talks started, the likeliest deal-breaker seemed to be the ceiling on American farm subsidies, which is far higher than America actually spends. In the end, the deal fell over protection not for Americas farmers bu
17、t for those of the developing world: a special safeguard mechanism, to kick in when imports surged. America wanted the trigger set high; India, joined by China, wanted it low. Both developing countries, it is said, also wanted to be able to jack tariffs up above existing ceilings, not merely those s
18、et in a Doha deal. After 60 hours of talk by Mr. Lamys count, there was deadlock; and that was that. Meanwhile, believe it or not, food is pricier than ever.Indias mountain ,Americas molehill You could call this a collective failure, as some ministers did. You could also be more specific. Indias wil
19、lingness to open its economy in reality is in lamentable contrast to its inability to commit itself at the WTO. Its stubbornness is explained by the ferocity of Indias politics on this subject and the desperate, even suicidal, poverty of many of its farmers. But it and China must have known that the
20、y were asking too much. America has some answering to do, too. It seems to have misread the big story: in the WTO, rich countries no longer call the shots, as they did in its predecessor, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. China and India, infuriating though they may be, are as powerful as
21、America and the EU. The United States also fumbled with the details. It might have tied up a deal on cotton, and left the Chinese and Indians isolated on safeguards. And the ultimate stumbling-block, though a mountain to India, was surely a molehill to a country of Americas wealth. America has 1 mil
22、lion farmers, India over 200 million. In the WTO, there is a saying: nothing is agreed until everything is agreed. But all the effort of nine days - or seven years - should not be lost. Mr. Lamy should publish what has been agreed so far. Ideally, the ministers would then meditate over the summer on
23、 what they have lost - and he could then ask for a final push. That, alas, seems a vain hope. With American elections looming, India heading for the polls by next May and a new European Commission due late next year, it may be 2010 before much can be done. There is a risk that by then, as Peter Mand
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 高等教育 高等教育大
![提示](https://www.31ppt.com/images/bang_tan.gif)
链接地址:https://www.31ppt.com/p-4562882.html