计算机专业毕业设计(论文)外文翻译1.doc
《计算机专业毕业设计(论文)外文翻译1.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《计算机专业毕业设计(论文)外文翻译1.doc(50页珍藏版)》请在三一办公上搜索。
1、编号: 毕业设计(英文)资料翻译院 (系): 计 算 机 系 专 业: 自 动 化 学生姓名: 学 号: 010320217 指导教师单位: 计 算 机 系 姓 名: 职 称: 实 验 师 Standalone Phono Pre-ampA HIGH-PRECISION PHONO PREAMPLIFIERby Fred Nachbaur, Dogstar 1997, 1: INTRODUCTIONThere has been much press lately about the merits (and drawbacks) of the venerable vacuum tube. How
2、 much of this retro movement is based in demonstrable principles, and how much is rooted in nostalgia or subjectivity is a debate that could fill volumes.What is clear is that there is considerable renewed interest in vacuum tubes, a technology that even two decades ago was considered as obsolete as
3、 spats and top hats. Now the trend is reversing, and a number of manufacturers are again supplying tube gear for audiophiles, musicians and hobbyists. In many cases, these are simply vintage circuits in new packaging. Other products offer new approaches to vacuum tube technology, adding what weve le
4、arned in the meantime to come up with some truly noteworthy designs. The project described here fits into the latter category.Why use tubes anyway?The central argument for the pro-tube movement is that specs can be almost meaningless, and that what counts is how it sounds to the individual listener.
5、 Highly subjective descriptions are therefore used, instead of the techno-babble weve more-or-less gotten used to in recent times. The opposite camp claims that numbers dont lie, and that you cant improve something by adding distortion of any kind.Both camps have valid points. Most of us have heard
6、expensive gear with spectacular specifications, but were left cold by the too good to be true, almost clinical sound of such equipment. Similarly, most people will agree that just because something has tubes in it doesnt make it worth listening to. Turn on one of those old All-American Five table-to
7、p AM radios if you want a striking demonstration of just how bad vacuum tube equipment can sound.Perhaps a way of reconciling the two viewpoints is to consider the distinction between musical equipment, and reproduction equipment. For musical gear, the individual frequency, waveform and phase distor
8、tions are part of what defines the sound of, say, a Fender tube amp. Just as no- one would try to define a fineStradivarius violin with specs and distortion figures, so also it would be specious to argue that a certain tube guitar amp has over 12% THD (total harmonic distortion) at 35 watts.Reproduc
9、tion equipment, on the other hand, has always been expected to give a perfect rendition of the signal applied to it. Sounds good in principle; if such a thing existed, we should be able to exactly and perfectly reproduce everything from a grundge band to the New York Philharmonic, making the reprodu
10、ctions indistinguishable from the original performances.But therein lies the rub. The overall sound of a stereo system depends so heavily on the room its in, the speakers, volume level, personal preference, and a host of other fuzzy variables that a perfect reproduction system cannot be said to exis
11、t even in this day and age, and probably never will. Add the fact that most if not all recordings are electronically sweetened to some degree to make them sound good (as opposed to being an exact copy of the performance), and arguments for the clinical reproduction approach lose credibility.Carried
12、to extremes, an ideal reproduction system wouldnt even have any controls, except perhaps for selecting inputs. If you think about it, personal preference is the only reason why stereos have volume controls, equalizers, and other adjustments to let us customize the sound to suit our very individual e
13、ars and brains.It might be best to view the reproduction gear as a continuation of the same process that started with the construction of the instruments used in the performance. What we ultimately hear is the sum total effect of everything from that original instrument design, to the way it is play
14、ed by the artist, through the entire recording, mixing and distribution process, to the gear we use to play it, and how weve set its controls.There is, therefore, a considerable difference in design approach between theinstrument and reproduction categories. An earlier design (The Real McTube) docum
15、ented a vacuum tube pre-amplifier for use as an adjunct to electric instruments. The design approach was largely empirical, and the emphasis was on highlighting the unique distortion characteristics of the vacuum tube. This article explores the reproduction aspect; the design approach was quite math
16、ematical and precise, and the emphasis is on controlling the characteristics of the vacuum tube.Vinyl vs. CDSimilar arguments are ongoing regarding vinyl records vs. compact discs. The CD camp points at the CDs accuracy, definition, and clarity, while vinyl lovers bemoan the CDs lack of warmth and c
17、laim that conventional records sound morenatural.This project gives you the opportunity to explore these subjective and controversial debates, letting your own ears be the judge. You may find that there are some recordings that sounds better through the tube pre-amp, and others that benefit from the
18、 improved definition (whatever that is, technically speaking) that good solid-state gear can offer.2: DESIGN PHILOSOPHYThe design philosophy was to improve on vintage tube designs by incorporating refinements normally only associated with solid-state gear. Prime among these is the use of differentia
19、l input stages, in which the inverting input is usedstrictly for feedback. Another is the use of direct coupling between stages, a technique once quite common in oscilloscopes, but rare in audio gear. The resulting circuits are thus closely related to the operational amplifier, and used in a similar
20、 fashion.In addition to the quasi-opamp idea, some other design concepts used in theproject are:Use of readily available parts wherever possible. For this reason, tube types 12AX7A and 12AT7A were employed.Direct coupling was used in crucial parts of the circuitry. More about this later.Flexibility
21、in use was a prime consideration. While this articles details the use of this circuit design as a magnetic (RIAA) and ceramic phono pre-amplifier, there is virtually no limit to the number of possible applications with suitable modification of the feedback networks.A Word About Negative FeedbackIt i
22、s perhaps an unfortunate accident of history that the term negative feedback was used to describe the linearization technique of applying a portion of the output signal back to the input, in opposite phase to the applied signal. It gives the impression to audiophiles with enough knowledge to be dang
23、erous that negative feedback must somehow be a bad thing. Ive seen diatribes against the evils of negative feedback, yet in the same breath such critics extol the virtues of ultra-linear output transformers. The joke is that such transformers achieve this linearization by applying local negative fee
24、dback to the screen grids!Perhaps a better moniker for negative feedback would be dynamic compensation or something on that order. Consider the following characteristics ofwell-designed negative feedback systems:A: Precise control over closed-loop gain and minimization of gain drift withcomponent ag
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 计算机专业 毕业设计 论文 外文 翻译
链接地址:https://www.31ppt.com/p-3992430.html