《经济学管理学基础知识及其应用》 .doc
《《经济学管理学基础知识及其应用》 .doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《《经济学管理学基础知识及其应用》 .doc(50页珍藏版)》请在三一办公上搜索。
1、和君商学院经济学管理学基础知识及其应用 和君咨询基础知识及其应用资料选读Table of ContentsA Note On Frameworks Strategic Tools Frameworks Economics Frameworks Finance Accounting Frameworks Sample Cases An IntroductionSample Case Suggested SolutionProfitability CasesMarket Entry General Strategy CasesMore Case Questions To TryMarket Siz
2、ing Estimation Cases More Market Sizing Estimation Cases To Try Brainteasers Cases With SlidesA Note On FrameworksBy the time you face a client we would like you to feel very confident that you can listen to a description of a situation and rapidly put together a systematic logical way of analyzing
3、it As a consultant the first important thing is how well you break a problem down and then logically try to solve it We want you to be able to say to yourself Ive done this for several cases I know I can deal with itA framework can guide your intelligent questioning of the clients lets youlay out yo
4、ur analysis in a coherent manner and lets you apply your experience to the case by pointing out how the case is an instance of a more general problem to which your experience appliesWe cannot overemphasize that this is a skill developed through practice There is no substitute for confronting a case
5、building your own systematic way to analyze it then improving your model through discussions with others Never be afraid to expose your model to others for fear that it is crude incomplete or wrong All frameworks have holes in them Thats the whole point of practicingto learn how to improve your init
6、ial models so that you will have a richer and more sophisticated set of organizing schemas to draw uponWhat is a frameworkThe world is confusing and to understand cause-effect relationships we have to distill most problems to their essence Thats what theory does highlight the most important aspects
7、of a situation that account for most of the variance between specific instances of the situationYou might call these important aspects drivers or critical success factors or independent variables If our model of the world is almost as complex as the world itself it is not very usefulmodels help us u
8、nderstand and predict only when they strip a problem down to something we can grasp a small set of key driving forces that we can focus on while ignoring other things that have far less explanatory power If you give a manager a checklist of 37 things to focus on she simply cannot grasp the essence o
9、f the problem If you can highlight a much smaller number of drivers and articulate the relationships among them she not only can grasp the problem but can apply those insights to other similar problemsFrameworksor call them models analytical schemas analytical lenses conceptual maps etc show the key
10、 cause and effect relationships that you think a person should focus on to approach a given situation They apply to a general class of problems each case is a specific instance of a problem class The acid test of whether a framework is useful is that it bothexplains and predicts It helps you underst
11、and what is going on in this case and draw appropriate analogies to other cases that exemplify the same problem class It helps you predict what will happen if the client takes a given course of action and test your prediction by seeing how other cases in the same problem class turn out These predict
12、ions are hypothesesthey are insights into what would follow if the world worked the way your model suggestsYou should not try to follow a recipe when constructing frameworks There are many many ways to organize an approach to a problem identify the key drivers and articulate the relationships among
13、them However some of these organizing structures are weak I will give you a few suggestions here purely to stimulate your thinking not because they represent the best frameworksChecklists The weakest framework is the checklist Simply telling managers Here are some things to think about does not help
14、 much A checklist does extract some elements from the problem for managers to focus on but it does not provide much insight into the nature of the problem nor does it show the relationship among the elementsSWOT Analyses One step up from a checklist and still a weak framework in my humble view is a
15、SWOT Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities and Threats analysis This is basically a checklist supplemented by pros and cons Again it does not provide a lot of insight into the cause-effect relationships in the problem and it does not show a relationship among those elementsThe Familiar Frameworks Let m
16、e pause for a moment here and suggest that I do not think much of the 7S framework McKinsey used that is in the heart of In Search of Excellence when it is used simply as a checklist Similarly it is a misuse of Porters five forces model simply to use the forces as topic headings Porter lays out many
17、 causal connections between each force and industry structure it is the causal connections not the list of five forces in and of itself which is of intellectual valueArticulating the three generic strategies cost leadership differentiation - broad market and differentiation - narrow market is not ve
18、ry interesting what is interesting is the notion that being stuck in the middle does not work Breaking a problem down into business processes of value chains represents progress only if you can articulate something about the interrelationships among those processes or linksMatrices A popular framewo
19、rk that is often misused is a matrix from the hoary 2x2 to the sophisticated multi-dimensional matrices Drawing a matrix does not in itself constitute building a framework What matters is whether you can articulate how the cells are different in some systematic wayFit Frameworks Somewhat more sophis
20、ticated is a fit framework For example you were exposed to the Tushman-Nadler diagnostic model in Organizational Behavior The idea is that the organization works only when it achieves congruence between its internal structure and the environment and congruence among its internal elements For example
21、 and organic structure may represent a better fit in a turbulent environment that a mechanistic structure which works better in more predictable environmentsSimilarly a low-cost producer cannot afford heavy RD investments while a firm pursuing first-mover strategy cannot compete on the basis of effi
22、ciency To use this kind of framework you need to spell-out the elements and what kinds of congruent configurations they can formDecision Trees An excellent framework is a decision tree You have had considerable practice constructing these during your first year and decision trees have a good deal of
23、 rigor and value especially in forcing you to identify contingencies Those of you interviewing with McKinsey will find that decision trees are looked on with great favor thereCausal models An often less formal framework than a decision tree is a causal model that essentially shows the cause and effe
24、ct relationships between a set of drivers These models tend to oversimplify contingencies but nonetheless can add considerable clarity to your thinking The most formal kind of cause model you could propose is a multivariate equation which with absolute precision and clarity specifies what you think
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 经济学管理学基础知识及其应用 经济学管理学基础知识及其应用 经济学 管理学 基础知识 及其 应用
链接地址:https://www.31ppt.com/p-3823596.html