Beware of Socialism.doc

《Beware of Socialism.doc》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《Beware of Socialism.doc（100页珍藏版）》请在三一办公上搜索。

1、Beware of SocialismTalks given from 13/4/70 to 17/4/70Original in Hindi5 ChaptersYear published: 19782nd edition 1984, RFI, USA.Also titled Be Aware of Socialism. 254 (small) pages.Beware of SocialismChapter #1Chapter title: I will say the truth13 April 1970 pm in Cross MaidanArchive code: 7004135Sh

2、ortTitle: SOCIAL01Audio: NoVideo: NoI would like to begin my talk today with an anecdote.In a great city, one day, the streets were crowded with tens of thousands of people. They were waiting with great expectation for the arrival of the king. A little later the royal procession came, and everybody

3、in that huge crowd started talking admiringly about the kings celestial garments. But strangely enough, the king was completely naked; he had not a shred of clothes on him.In all the crowd only one small child, who came perched on his fathers shoulders, saw it, and he said to his father with amazeme

4、nt, Everybody is talking about the kings clothes, but I see he is completely naked. His father said, Keep quiet, you fool. We will be in great trouble if someone heard what you said. And the father hurriedly made his way out of the crowd.The king was naked. and the people were praising his garments.

5、 What was the matter?A few months earlier a clever man had come to the court and offered to bring the garments of The gods for the king. He said to him, Although you have conquered the world, yet you dont have the clothes of the gods. I can make them available to you. The kings greed was aroused. He

6、 had everything, but he did not have the gods clothes. He had not seen them; he had not even heard of them. The man said. You dont worry. It will cost you a little, but I will bring them for you. He asked for six months time.The man was locked in a house in the palace, and armed guards were placed a

7、ll around him. The man, from time to time, asked for large sums of money. And in the course of six months he was paid many millions of rupees from the treasury. But as he was imprisoned in the palace and so could not escape with the money, the king was undisturbed.After six months the man returned t

8、o the court with the godly clothes in a costly box. Many kings had been invited to the court to witness the great event. The man opened the box and said to the king, Please give me your turban. He put the kings turban in the box, took out another one, and proceeded to place it on the head of the kin

9、g. But his hands were empty, and the king saw it well. The man said to the king, Do you see the turban? And then he said in a whisper, When I was leaving for your court, the gods told me that only those who are legitimate sons of their fathers will be able to see these celestial clothes. His hands w

10、ere empty, but immediately the king started seeing the turban. And he said, Never have I seen such a gorgeous turban.So one by one, all the kings clothes were taken away and put in the box. and the king put on the clothes that were not there at all. He was gradually disrobed. And when it came to the

11、 last piece the king was very disturbed. But the man said, It is no use worrying now. The journey of untruth, once begun, has to be completed. There is no way out. And what will the people say? And then he openly announced to the court that these clothes would be visible only to those who were truly

12、 their fathers sons. And the king was deprived of the last article of his clothing. But now everybody in the court saw the heavenly garments, which were not there at all. Each one of the courtiers thought that when the clothes were visible to all others, they must be there. He also felt, to his sham

13、e, that he was the only one in the gathering who was unable to see the clothes, so his parentage was in doubt; but it was wise to keep it to himself.All this had happened inside the palace.Then the man said,Your Highness, the gods also said that as this was the first time that divine clothes were be

14、ing sent to the earth, it is necessary that they be celebrated by being taken out in a procession. Your chariot is ready. Let us go out. The king was worried once again. But the man said promptly, Dont worry at all. The drummers will be going at the head of your procession announcing that the gods c

15、lothes will be visible only to those who are truly born of their fathers. So everyone will see them, you need not worry.The king mounted the chariot, and the procession began. Everybody in the crowd in the streets saw that the king was naked, but no one had the guts to say it. Only a small child had

16、 said so, and for this he was scolded by his father. His father had said, Keep quiet, you fool, you are simply inexperienced in the ways of the world. When you will be a grownup, you will begin to see the clothes. Let us go home, because we will be in trouble if someone heard what you said.Why do I

17、begin my talk on socialism with this anecdote? What is the point?In the name of socialism today a great uproar is being raised all over the world. In this huge crowd, shouting hurray to socialism, my position is like that of the little child who exclaimed, Father, the king is stark naked; there are

18、no clothes on his body. I feel it is time somebody said it.Human nature is such that it accepts a well-published lie as truth. A lie repeated again and again begins to look like truth. And truth said for the first time does not look like truth. For the last hundred years a systematic myth has been c

19、reated around socialism. And its constant propaganda and slogan-mongering have made socialists of those who are not socialists at all. Even those who do not accept it in their hearts have begun to sing hymns of praise to socialism. And no one seems to have the courage to speak against it. I am an in

20、experienced man in the world of the experienced, and, therefore, I am going to speak out against socialism.The history of mankind says that it is not necessary that what the large crowd, the masses, accept should be the truth. The crowd has always accepted great lies, and lived with them. Now a new

21、lie, in the name of socialism, has captured the minds of men. So it is essential to understand its full implications.The first thing to understand is that socialism today stands as an enemy, in opposition to capitalism. But whatever socialism may be, it is the child of capitalism. Capitalism arose o

22、ut of the system of feudalism. And if capitalism is allowed to develop fully, it will lead to socialism. And socialism, allowed to run its full course, will turn into communism. And in the same way communism can lead to anarchism. But the basic condition is that these systems should be allowed to ev

23、olve fully, completely. But a child can be forced prematurely out of its mothers womb, and the mother may feel tempted to have a child sooner than later. An impatient mother may want to have the child in five months, instead of nine; she will escape four months of labor and see her child earlier. Bu

24、t such a child will be a dead child, not a living one. And even if the child survives, it will be worse than dead.The socialism that was born in Russia is such a premature child. Russia was not a capitalist country, so socialism was forced on it much before its time. Socialism was born, but it was b

25、orn dead. That is why ten million people, all poor people, the very people for whom socialism was ushered in, had to be killed mercilessly. Perhaps in the history of mankind no other country has resorted to such colossal killings as the two socialist countries, Russia and China, have done. And the i

26、rony is that the people who were slaughtered were those for whom socialism was brought in. Russia never had ten million capitalists. Ten million capitalists dont exist even in America today. Yet ten millions were butchered in Russia, that we know. And they were those for whom socialism came into bei

27、ng.But killing becomes easy when killing is done in your own interest. When somebody kills in your name you are disarmed, you cannot even defend yourself.And even after murdering ten millions of their men and women and children, Russia remains a poor country. Even today Russia is not a rich country.

28、 Its socialism is anemic and sick; it is lifeless. And thats why Russia, for the last few years, has been reverting to the capitalist way. The mistake they made is being corrected by a return to capitalist measures. The basic conflict of Mao Tse-tung with Russia is just this: that Russia is increasi

29、ngly turning to capitalism.Experiences of the past fifty years have made Russia realize that socialism was a hasty step on their part, because they have not created capital, created wealth. Remember, if capitalism is developed properly, socialism will be its natural outcome - in a pregnancy of nine

30、months the child comes out of its mothers womb naturally and silently. So, talk of socialism when capitalism has not yet grown to its full height, is suicidal.I am myself a socialist, so it will surprise you when I ask you to beware of socialism. I also want the child of socialism to come to India,

31、but on one condition - that it completes its full nine months in the mothers womb. This country has not achieved capitalism as yet. So talk of socialism here at this moment is as dangerous. as dangerous as it proved in Russia, and is going to be proved in China. China is out to kill millions, and ye

32、t socialism will not come there, because nothing in life happens before its time. The law of life does not permit haste. This country has yet to develop its capitalist system.It is necessary to understand what capitalism means. Today the word capitalism comes to our minds as a four-letter word. It i

33、s now a much maligned word. We rush to condemn capitalism without knowing what good it has done to human society, and that it is the instrument that will lead human society to socialism. If all men are ever going to achieve equality, if they all are ever going to be free of poverty and attain to aff

34、luence, then a hundred percent credit for it will go to capitalism.It is, however, essential that we understand a few things about capitalism very clearly. First, capitalism is a system that creates capital, creates wealth. Before capitalism, no other system in the world had produced capital. By cap

35、ital I do not mean natural resources - it is that tangible wealth which is mans own creation. If man had not created it, it would not have come on its own from the earth or the skies. Wealth means solid wealth, accumulated capital, which today is the source of all investment, all production. The wea

36、lth in the present world is created wealth. And it does not include that natural wealth which is available from land and sea, from mine and forest, from stream and waterfall, or from anywhere else. During the last hundred and fifty years, capitalism brought into being a real wealth-producing system.

37、All the social systems that preceded capitalism were predatory systems - systems wholly based on plunder and loot. Whether it was Genghis or Tamburlaine or any feudal lords of the world, they all had plundered their people and filled their coffers with the wealth of looting. But the wealth in the ca

38、pitalist system is different: capitalism created its own wealth.Without giving thought to it, we are accustomed to equating capitalism with the feudal system. We think that capitalism has also exploited others wealth. This is not so. Capitalism has really created capital; it has really produced weal

39、th, lots of wealth.When wealth is created, then, and only then its equitable distribution is possible. Without creating wealth, what are we going to distribute? Today, Indira Gandhi and her foolish friends think that socialism can be established in India, and that wealth can be distributed. It means

40、 that they are thinking of distributing wealth without having it. Today, the country has no wealth. If we embark on distribution, we can only distribute poverty, not wealth. There is no wealth and poverty we have in abundance. And it is already widely distributed.Distribution is necessary, but befor

41、e distribution we have to have wealth. Production comes first; distribution follows it. Capitalism produces wealth and socialism distributes it. If there is no capitalism, and so no wealth, then socialism can distribute only poverty and misery. If our country decides to go socialist, it means that w

42、e decide to remain poor, and poor forever. It cannot be anything else, because we dont have the instruments that produce wealth.The second thing to understand is that all the people of the world have not contributed to the creation of wealth. Wealth today is the handiwork of a handful of people, a f

43、ew individuals. It has not been created by the masses. Only a Rockefeller, only a Morgan, a Rothschild, a Tata, a Birla, a Sahu creates capital, not everybody. If we remove ten names from America, America would be as poor as we are. Without them, America could not have achieved its present affluence

44、.I have heard that once Henry Ford went to London. At the airport he walked up to the inquiry office and asked for a cheap hotel. The clerk at the inquiry booth recognized him, and he said, I have seen your photographs in the newspapers; it seems you are Henry Ford. Why do you ask for a cheap hotel?

45、 When your sons and daughters come here, they ask for the most expensive hotels. Ford replied, My sons are the sons of Henry Ford, sons of a very rich man, while I am the son of a poor man. I have made wealth myself. I am not the son of a Ford who produced wealth. So let me find a cheap hotel.Whatev

46、er wealth America possesses today is the creation of a handful of inventive geniuses and a few others who knew the art of producing wealth. Why didnt the whole world produce wealth? Why does not India produce it today? It is still so poor. India has the oldest culture, yet we could not produce wealt

47、h. We failed to develop the art of creating capital, because as a people we have been against wealth, anti-wealth. That is why our genius could not take the road to prosperity and affluence. Whatever intelligence and talent we had, we channelized it in the direction of sannyas, renunciation. The man

48、 who could have been a Ford became a Shankaracharya. The man who could have been a Rockefeller became Gautam the Buddha. So we produced great sannyasins; we produced Buddha, Shankara, Nagarjuna, Mahavira. But we failed to produce able capitalists - those skilled in creating wealth. Because of our op

49、position to riches, we could not direct our talent that way.A traveler, Count Keyserling, after his visit to India, wrote in his diary a small sentence: India is a rich country where poor people live. I was a little amazed to read it. And I thought Keyserling was simply crazy. If India was a rich country, how could its people be poor? And if its people were poor, how could it be called a rich country? But then I underst