辩论学校不应该成为旅游景点对游客开放.doc
《辩论学校不应该成为旅游景点对游客开放.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《辩论学校不应该成为旅游景点对游客开放.doc(10页珍藏版)》请在三一办公上搜索。
1、the university compus should be open to the tourists.One can always find visitors taking pictures and enjoying the scenery in university compus. During the May Day Holiday, National Day Holiday, summer and winter vacations, many University campuses become popular tourist sites. In my opinion, univer
2、sity campus should be open to tourists.In fact, there are many royal gardens and parks, all of them obviously better than the scenery in the Universities. Why do you think people prefer visiting here with their children? That is because it is a dream goal for many Chinese parents and young ambitious
3、 students. Besides this, as more tourists come to visit universities, these universities can widen their influence as well and they can also make some profit from the tourism.The door is closed, thought is closed?Colleges and universities should take teaching, and open to tourists, is the college by
4、 education establishments to commercial, entertainment places, this is reasonable?一个人总是可以找到游客拍照,并欣赏美景在大学校园。五一假期期间,国庆假期,夏季和冬季度假,许多大学校园成为最受欢迎的旅游景点。在我看来,大学校园应向游人开放。事实上,有很多皇家花园和公园,他们所有人都明显优于大学上的景物。你认为人们为什么喜欢访问这里的带着他们的孩子吗?那是因为它是一个梦想的目标为许多中国父母和年轻有抱负的学生。除此之外,随着更多的游客来此参观大学,这些大学能扩大他们的影响,而且还能让某种利益,而违背初衷,旅游业的发
5、展。门是关着的,思想就是关着的吗?高校应该以教书育人为主,而向游客开放,是将高校由教育性场所改为商业性、娱乐性的场所,这也是合理的吗?其实,大学是否应该对民众开放是见仁见智、尚无定论的事。开放的好处自不待言:一方面,既缓解了旅游景点的紧张,又满足了人们对于科学、文化、人文精神的景仰之情。这是无须投资就有良好社会效益、利国利民的好事;另一方面,校方拒绝游人进校也言之有理,学校确实不是公园,安全、管理方面的考虑在情理之中。In fact, whether the university should be open to the public, is inconclusive. Different
6、people, different views.It goes without saying that the benefits of open: on the one hand, they can ease the tension of tourist attractions, and meet the people for science, culture, the humanistic spirit of admiration.It is not required investment has good social benefit, benefit of the country and
7、 the people; on the other hand, the school refused to visitors but also it stands to reason. Do not park, schools, security, management considerations in reason.实际上,国外大学实行的办法也是不一样的,这个问题并不存在“国际通行惯例”。牛津大学的各个学院是不让进的,而且管得很严,而哈佛大学每道门都没有人把守,莫斯科大学也让外人参观。美国的康乃尔大学不但校园风景如画,让人游览,而且图书馆也对外开放,任何人都可以充分利用,查阅、复印资料极其
8、方便。In fact, the foreign universitys approach is not the same, this problem does not exist international convention.University of Oxford each college is not to, but very strict control, and the Harvard University, each door no one guard, also let outsiders to visit Moscow State University.The United
9、States Cornell University not only picturesque campus, let people visit, and the library is open to the outside world, anyone can make full use of, access, copying data is extremely convenient.但是我们认为,大学还是对民众开放为好。相对而言,国家对大学的投入是相当高的,尤其是最近若干年以来更是如此。当然,“十年树木,百年树人”,我们期待的是大学培养人才的长远效益,但在国家资金重点倾斜的地方,能顺带产生一点
10、短期效益,让普通纳税人心理更为平衡,何乐而不为?一般民众对大学是十分景仰的,但却往往无缘进入。这样,让民众有机会进大学去看一看,缩短一些优秀人才和普通民众的心理差距,就是值得一为的好事。But we think that the university is open to the public, as well.Relatively speaking, National University input is quite high, especially in recent years is even more so.Of course, it takes ten years to grow
11、a tree and a hundred years to bring up a generation of good men, we look forward to the university personnel training long-term benefits, but in state funds to tilt the focus place, can conveniently produce a short-term benefit, let ordinary taxpayers mind more balanced, what is there against it?The
12、 general public university is very respected, but often not enter.So, let people have the opportunity to enter the university to see, shortening some outstanding talent and common peoples psychological gap, is worth a good.有位学者讲的一个故事很能说明这个道理:他的一个亲戚在工厂工作,儿子快毕业时对上大学念书毫无兴趣。A scholar tell a story to exp
13、lain this: one of his relatives working in the factory, son soon graduated to university without interest.那时,“文革”刚结束,“读书无用论”很流行。有一天,他带儿子进城办事,无意间走到一所大学,就进去了。他在那里给儿子指指点点,随便讲述一阵。他儿子对此的反应是:“哦,我以前不知道世界上还有大学这么好的地方!”结果,他儿子后来考上重点大学,又读了研究生。进大学一游,就这样开了一个青年的眼界,影响了他的一生。At that time, the Cultural Revolution had
14、just ended, study useless is very popular.One day, he took his son to go downtown, accidentally go to a university, went in.He was there to gesticulate casually tells a son.His sons response was: Oh, I didnt know there is such a good place university!The results, his son was admitted to a key univer
15、sity, read a graduate student.In the university a swim, then opened a youth outlook, affected his life.我们主张大学开放,同时主张不要简单地把这当成让不让人进来玩一玩的事,而应当在深层次上考虑,要有周全的筹划。不然,如果教学、科研工作受影响,再出点治安方面的问题,良好的愿望也维持不长久。美国的西点军校不但不是“军事重地”,反而有一整套旅游的服务和设施。当然,让人了解、喜欢这个学校,吸引年轻人投考这个学校的宣传工作也十分到家。毕竟,在美国这个商业气息较浓的社会,要吸引青年从军,要加强国防意识,不
16、太容易。西点军校的开放和旅游服务意识,很可能有深谋远虑的大局观。We advocate the university open, at the same time that do not simply regard it as let people play thing, but should be deeply considered, there must be comprehensive planning.Otherwise, if the teaching, scientific research work of the affected, a point of order proble
17、ms, good wishes to maintain not for long.The United States West Point not only military areas, but there is a set of tourism services and facilities.Of course, let people understand, love the school, to attract young people for the school is also home to publicize the job.After all, in the United St
18、ates the commercial atmosphere thick society, in order to attract young join the army, to strengthen the awareness of national defense, not too easy.The West Point open and tourism service consciousness, are likely to know what one is about the general situation view.如果在我们的大学是否开放的问题上,能够把平民意识、服务意识与国家
19、长远利益意识结合起来,那该有多好。If in our university is open to question, to the civilian consciousness, service consciousness and consciousness of national long-term interests together, how good that the.立论环节,正方一辩表示大学要承担社会服务的责任,开放校园,“与民同乐”是对社会的一种回馈,也是对科学文化的很好的传播方式,还能对学校的宣传起到很大作用,因此提出自己的观点“高等学府应该对游客开放”。而反方一辩则利用一些发
20、生在大学校园中的外来犯罪分子冒充游客盗窃,行凶等案例,说明高等学府对游客开放会导致高校形象受损,校园环境被破坏,以及增加学校管理难度和财政负担等问题出现,从而提出相反的观点。接着进入短兵相接的攻辩环节,以及最为精彩的自由辩论阶段,双方队员唇枪舌剑,妙语连珠。正方提出开放是有限制的开放,针对反方提出的高校因为外来游客的进入而校园环境受到破坏的问题,正方队员认为可以依靠学校优化制度来解决。高校对外开放可以充分利用资源回馈社会,满足社会大众对高校的深厚情结,让人们能进入高校感受其人文气息,好处远大于坏处。而反方认为外来游客的进入给学校学生带来了很多困扰,是对学生应该享有的资源的侵犯,高等学府为社会服
21、务的义务应该是靠培养更多学生来为社会服务,而不是作为旅游景点供人参观。Theoretical link, affirmative argument that university should assume responsibility for social services, open campus, have fun with the citizens is a form of social feedback, but also on the scientific culture very good mode of transmission, but also on the school
22、publicity plays a large role, therefore put forward their views institutions of higher learning should be open to tourists.And the leader of the opposition by some in the university campus in alien criminals posing as tourists such as theft, assault case, that of higher learning open to visitors wil
23、l cause the university image, campus environment, and increase the difficulty of school management and financial burden and other problems, and brings forward the contrary viewpoint.Then enter the fight hand to hand with attack debate link, as well as the most wonderful free debate, the two players
24、debate, sparkling discourse.Affirmative proposed opening is restricted to the open, the college for foreign tourists into the campus environment is damaged, affirmative team that can rely on schools to solve the optimization system.The opening to the outside world can make full use of resource to co
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 辩论 学校 应该 成为 旅游景点 游客 开放 doc
链接地址:https://www.31ppt.com/p-3018843.html