ICU镇痛躁动谵妄指南解读1.ppt
《ICU镇痛躁动谵妄指南解读1.ppt》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《ICU镇痛躁动谵妄指南解读1.ppt(76页珍藏版)》请在三一办公上搜索。
1、,2013,ICU成人患者疼痛,躁动,谵妄处理临床实践指南解读 2013,Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Pain,Agitation,and Delirium in Adult Patients in the Intensive Care Unit,ICU镇痛镇静的临床意义,解除患者的焦虑,恐慌;减轻生理应激反应;解除疼痛;使机械通气容易进行;顺利完成床边护理、诊断与治疗;恢复患者昼夜生理节律;.。,减少并发症及死亡率减少ICU入住日及住院日减少医疗费用,Pain,Agitation,Delirium 2013,PAD g
2、uidelines,Crit Care Med 2002,30:119141,Crit Care Med 2013,41:263306,2013,PAD guidelines,该指南由美国重症医学院(The American College of Critical Care Medicine ACCM),美国重症医学会(Society of Critical Care Medicine SCCM)美国健康体系药学家协会(American Society of Health-System Pharmacists ASHP)支持完成。该指南得到美国胸科医师学院(the American Colle
3、ge of Chest Physicians ACCP)的认可;得到美国呼吸治疗学会(the American Association for Respiratory Care AARC)的支持;美国重症医学(CCM)发表:2013;41(1):263-306,ACCM组成了来自于多专业、多机构的20人特别工作组,密切合作6年共同制定此指南。通过全球8个临床收索引擎数据库,收评 ICU相关的疼痛与止痛,躁动与镇静,谵妄与相关结果的19,000篇文献。,2013,PAD guidelines,指南以陈述(statements)and 与推荐意见(recommendations)的方式表达:-53
4、个“陈述与推荐意见”(2013 PAD Guidelines)-28个“推荐意见”(2002 ASG Guidelines)每一项陈述的证据质量分为:高(A)中(B)低/很低(C)推荐意见的强度分为:强(1)弱(2)支持与反对意见分为:支持(+)反对(-)对推荐意见强烈的使用“We recommend”(推荐.)对推荐意见较弱的使用“We suggest”(建议.)对无任何证据或无专家共识的使用“no recommendation”(0),What do the 2013,PAD Guidelines Say?,疼痛与镇痛Pain and Analgesia,ICU疼痛的发病率Incidenc
5、e of Pain in ICU Patients,成年内科、外科、创伤ICU患者常经历疼痛折磨,包括休息与常规ICU治疗的时间(B)Adult medical,surgical,and trauma ICU patients routinely experience pain,both at rest and with routine ICU care(B).在心外科病人疼痛普遍并且没有得到治疗;女性比男性经历的疼痛更严重(B)Pain in adult cardiac surgery patients is common and poorly treated;women experienc
6、e more pain than men after cardiac surgery(B).ICU操作性疼痛普遍存在(B)Procedural pain is common in adult ICU patients(B).,77%的病人在ICU经历着中度/重度疼痛,38%存在慢性疼痛,ICU疼痛评估Pain Assessment in ICU Patients,推荐对所有ICU患者应常规进行疼痛监测(+1B)We recommend that pain be routinely monitored in all adult ICU patients(+1B).解读说明:ICU患者的日常疼痛评
7、估和改善他们临床预后相关。疼痛评估和减少镇痛药用量,ICU住院时间缩短(LOS),以及机械通气时间减少有显著相关性。疼痛评估对于恰当的治疗很有必要,因此对所有ICU患者执行常规疼痛评估的强烈建议是适当的,因为这样做利远远大于弊(as the benefits strongly outweigh the risks.)。,患者对疼痛的自我描述被认为是“金标准”,临床医生应该尝试首先让患者自己评价他们自己的疼痛。(B)A patients self-report of pain is considered the“gold standard,”and clinicians should alway
8、s attempt to have a patient rate his or her own pain first(B).,ICU疼痛评估Pain Assessment in ICU Patients,指南反对单纯根据生命体征(或包括生命体征在内的观察性疼痛量表)评估成年ICU患者的疼痛(-2C)。但指南同时建议生命体征可以作为患者需要接受进一步评估疼痛的线索(+2C)。We do not suggest that vital signs(or observational pain scales that include vital signs)be used alone for pain
9、assessment in adult ICU patients(2C).We suggest that vital signs may be used as a cue to begin further assessment of pain in these patients,however(+2C).,ICU疼痛评估Pain Assessment in ICU Patients,如何对不能自述表达疼痛的患者进行疼痛的评估?,对于不能自行描述疼痛但运动功能正常,且表情行为可以被观察的ICU患者(不包括颅脑外伤),“行为疼痛评分表(BPS)”和“重症疼痛观察工具(CPOT)是监测这类ICU患者
10、疼痛的最有效和可靠的疼痛量表。(B)The Behavioral Pain Scale(BPS)and the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool(CPOT)are the most valid and reliable behavioral pain scales for monitoring pain(B),ICU疼痛评估Pain Assessment in ICU Patients,The Behavioral Pain Scale(BPS)&the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool(CPOT),The Behav
11、ioral Pain Scale(BPS):面部表情 上肢运动 呼吸机耐受性 每项指标评分范围:14分 1分没有疼痛 4分极度疼痛 总分312分 The Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool(CPOT):面部表情 肢体动作 呼吸机耐受性 肌肉紧张度 每项指标评分范围:02分 0分没有疼痛 2分极度疼痛,The Behavioral Pain Scale(BPS),The Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool(CPOT),疼痛的治疗Treatment of Pain in ICU Patients,指南推荐在成人ICU拔出胸管之
12、前预先使用止痛药或非药物干预(如:放松),以减轻患者疼痛(+1C)。We recommend that preemptive analgesia and/or nonpharmacologic interventions(e.g.,relaxation)be administered to alleviate pain in adult ICU patients prior to chest tube removal(+1C).指南建议在实施其他介入的或可能导致疼痛的操作时,应预先使用止痛药或非药物干预,以减轻疼痛(+2C)We suggest that for other types of
13、invasive and potentially painful procedures in adult ICU patients,preemptive analgesic therapy and/or nonpharmacologic interventions may also be administered to alleviate pain(+2C).指南建议所有行机械通气的ICU患者应采用镇痛优先的镇静方法(+2B)。We suggest that analgesiafirst sedation be used in adult ICU patients who are mechan
14、ically ventilated(+2B).,指南推荐静脉应用阿片类药物作为一线首选用药治疗非神经病理性疼痛(+1C)。We recommend that IV opioids be considered as the firstline drug class of choice to treat nonneuropathic pain in critically ill patients(+1C).所有可应用的静脉阿片类药物,在滴定至相似的疼痛强度终点时,均具有同等效应(C)。All available IV opioids,when titrated to similar painint
15、ensity endpoints,are equally effective(C).,疼痛的治疗Treatment of Pain in ICU Patients,解读说明:指南不再优先推荐芬太尼,认为所有阿片类药物疗效相似,指南建议应用非阿片类药物来减少阿片类药物的用量(或彻底解除静脉应用阿片类药物的需求),以减少阿片类药物相关的副作用(+2C)。We suggest that nonopioid analgesics be considered to decrease the amount of opioids administered(or to eliminate the need f
16、or intravenous opioids altogether),and to decrease opioidrelated side effects(+2C).指南推荐对于神经病理性疼痛肠道内应用加巴喷丁,或卡马西平,来辅助静脉应用阿片类药物(+1A)We recommend that either enterally administered gabapentin or carbamazepine,in addition to intravenous opioids,should be considered for treatment of neuropathic pain(+1A).
17、,疼痛的治疗Treatment of Pain in ICU Patients,躁动与镇静Agitation and Sedation,Agitation,是一种伴有不停动作的易激惹状态,或者说是一种伴随着挣扎动作的极度焦虑状态。在ICU中,70%以上的患者发生过躁动。引起焦虑的原因均可以导致躁动。另外,某些药物的不良反应、休克、低氧血症,低血糖、酒精及其他药物的戒断反应、机械通气不同步等也是引起躁动的常见原因。研究显示最易使重症患者焦虑、躁动的原因依次为:疼痛、失眠、经鼻或经口腔的各种插管、失去支配自身能力的恐惧感以及身体其他部位的各种管道限制等。,ICU镇静的意义与原则,由于躁动和焦虑在I
18、CU常见并可导致严重后果,因此ICU患者镇静显得尤为重要。镇静实施前应消除可能导致患者躁动的原因,如疾病本身,谵妄,低氧血症,低血糖或者酒精等药物戒断症状等。,指南指出保持患者轻度(浅)镇静水平与临床结局改善有关(如:缩短机械通气时间,缩短ICU住院天数LOS)(B)Maintaining light levels of sedation in adult ICU patients is associated with improved clinical outcomes(e.g.,shorter duration of mechanical ventilation and a shorter
19、 ICU length of stay LOS)(B).保持轻度(浅)镇静水平可能增加患者生理应激反应,但同时并不增加心肌缺血的发生率(B)Maintaining light levels of sedation increases the physiologic stress response,but is not associated with an increased incidence of myocardial ischemia(B).,ICU患者维持轻度镇静的受益大于风险。,指南推荐患者镇静用药应该滴定式镇静方式以维持轻度镇静水平,而不是深度镇静水平,除非存在临床反指征(+1B)W
20、e recommend that sedative medications be titrated to maintain a light rather than a deep level of sedation in adult ICU patients,unless clinically contraindicated(+1B).,镇静深度与临床结局Depth of sedation vs.clinical outcomes,怎样评估镇静?How do we assess sedation?,镇静深度监测Monitoring depth of sedation,“Richmond躁动-镇静
21、评分(RASS)”与“镇静-躁动评分(SAS)”是ICU患者测量镇静质量与镇静深度的最真实与可靠的镇静评估工具(B)。The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale(RASS)and Sedation-Agitation Scale(SAS)are the most valid and reliable sedation assessment tools for measuring quality and depth of sedation in adult ICU patients(B).指南不推荐客观脑功能检测方法(如:听觉诱发电位AEPs,脑电双频指数BIS,
22、麻醉趋势指数NI,病人状态指数PSI,状态熵SE)用于非昏迷、非肌松的重症患者作为基本的镇静深度监测方法,因为这些监测方法不能替代患者主观镇静系统的评分结果(-1B)We do not recommend that objective measures of brain function(e.g.,auditory evoked potentials AEPs,Bispectral Index BIS,Narcotrend Index NI,Patient State Index PSI,or state entropy SE)be used as the primary method to
23、monitor depth of sedation in noncomatose,nonparalyzed critically ill adult patients,as these monitors are inadequate substitutes for subjective sedation scoring systems(1B).,指南建议在应用肌松药物的ICU患者使用客观脑功能的监测(如:AEPs,BIS,NI,PSI,或SE)作为补充,因为在这些患者,主观镇静监测无法取得(+2B)We suggest that objective measures of brain func
24、tion(e.g.,auditory evoked potentials AEP,Bispectral Index BIS,Narcotrend Index NI,Patient State Index PSI,or state entropy SE)be used as an adjunct to subjective sedation assessments in adult ICU patients who are receiving neuromuscular blocking agents,as subjective sedation assessments may be unobt
25、ainable in these patients(+2B).,镇静深度监测Monitoring depth of sedation,Richmond躁动-镇静评分(RASS)Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale RASS,RASS镇静程度评估表(Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale),镇静-躁动评分Sedation-Agitation scale,SAS,镇静-躁动评分Sedation-Agitation scale,SAS,简单可行的方法,open eyesmaintain eye contact squeeze hand
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- ICU 镇痛 躁动 谵妄 指南 解读
链接地址:https://www.31ppt.com/p-2911338.html