从合作原则角度分析《生活大爆炸》中的对话幽默英语论文.doc
《从合作原则角度分析《生活大爆炸》中的对话幽默英语论文.doc》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《从合作原则角度分析《生活大爆炸》中的对话幽默英语论文.doc(37页珍藏版)》请在三一办公上搜索。
1、本科生毕业论文(设计)册 学院 XXX学院 专业 XX 班级 XXXX级笔译X班 学生 XXX 指导教师 XXX XXXX大学本科毕业论文(设计)任务书编 号: 论文(设计)题目: 从合作原则角度分析生活大爆炸中的对话幽默 学院: XXX学院 专业: 笔译 班级: 2XXXX级笔译X班 学生姓名: XXX 学号: XXXXXX 指导教师: XXX 职称:XX 1、 论文(设计)研究目标及主要任务本论文的研究目标是探讨合作原则在情景喜剧生活大爆炸中的应用及产生的幽默效果。其主要任务是通过分析合作原则的应用提高我们沟通、交流能力 。2、论文(设计)的主要内容 本论文分为四章,第一章介绍合作原则、幽
2、默的定义及其分类,第二章介绍中外语言学家关于言语幽默的语言学研究成果,第三章分析生活大爆炸中由于违背合作原则而产生的众多幽默效果,第四章探讨研究合作原则的重要意义。 3、论文(设计)的基础条件及研究路线 本论文的基础条件是不同的语言学家关于言语幽默的研究结果。研究路线是对生活大爆炸中的幽默对话进行整理归类,并运用合作原则进行分析阐述。 4、主要参考文献Attardo, S. 1994. Linguistic Theories of Humor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Grice, H.P. 1975. “Logic and Conversation”. Synt
3、ax and Semantics: Speech Acts No. 3, 41-58. Hu, Zhuanglin. 2006. Linguistics: A Course Book. Beijing: Beijing UP.Zhang, Yan. 2002. “The Violation of the Cooperative Principles in Catch-22.” Diss. Hebei Normal University.5、计划进度阶段起止日期1确定初步论文题目3月14日前2与导师见面,确定大致范围,填开题报告和任务书,导师签字3月14日-3月19日3提交论文提纲3月19日-3
4、月28日4交初稿和文献综述3月28日-4月18日5交终稿和评议书5月8日前指 导 教师: 年 月 日教研室主任: 年 月 注:一式三份,学院(系)、指导教师、学生各一份XXXX大学本科生毕业论文(设计)开题报告书 XXX 学院 XX 专业 XXXX 届学生姓名XXX论文(设计)题目 从合作原则角度分析生活大爆炸中的对话幽默指导教师XXX专业职称 XX所属教研室英语基础教研室研究方向语言学课题论证:从违背格莱斯合作原则角度论证情景喜剧生活大爆炸中的幽默对话效果。方案设计:第一章介绍合作原则、幽默的定义及其分类,第二章介绍中外语言学家关于言语幽默的语言学研究成果, 第三章分析生活大爆炸中由于违背合
5、作原则而产生的众多幽默效果, 第四章研究合作原则的重要意义。 进度计划:3月14日前确定初步论文题目 3月19日前写开题报告、任务书3月28日前提交论文提纲4月18日前提交初稿和文献综述5月8日前交终稿和评议书指导教师意见: 指导教师签名: 年 月 日教研室意见: 教研室主任签名: 年 月 日XXXX大学本科生毕业论文(设计)评议书姓 名XXX学院XXX学院专业XX年级(班)XXXX级笔译X班论 文 题 目 从合作原则角度分析生活大爆炸中的对话幽默完成时间2013/5/4论文内容摘要本论文主要以情景喜剧生活大爆炸中的对话为例,分析由于违背格赖斯的合作原则而产生的众多幽默效果。第一章主要对合作原
6、则及其会话含义,幽默的定义及其分类作简要概述。第二章主要讨论中外语言学家关于言语幽默的语言学研究成果。 第三章从四个角度分析在生活大爆炸中通过违反合作原则所产生的幽默效果。第四章讲述研究合作原则的重要意义。因为它不仅可以帮助我们更好的欣赏电视节目,还可以提高我们理解他人,与他人交流的能力,从而使我们更好的享受生活。 指导教师评语 年 月 日指 导 教 师职称初评成绩答辩小组姓名职称教研室组长成员答辩记录: 记录人签字: 年 月 日答辩小组意见: 组长签字: 年 月 日学院意见: 评定成绩: 签章 年 月 日XXXX大学本科生毕业论文(设计)文献综述Literature Review1.Ling
7、uistic Approaches on Verbal Humor Study AbroadHumor research has a long and glorious history. However, linguistics held an assured position in the late 1970s among the central player of humor research, which was traditionally psychology, sociology, and philosophy (Attardo, 1997: 395). Linguistic stu
8、dy on humor is concerning with linguistic devices such as exaggeration, ambiguity, pun etc is very common. Pepicello in his work The Language of Riddles (1984) pointed out that humor had a close relationship with ambiguity , and humor depended on the indecipherable ambiguity until the punch line res
9、olved it in an unexpected way.Raskins the Semantic Script Theory of Humor (SSTH for short) (1985) is the semantic theory on verbal humor from the point of cognitive linguistics. The aim of the SSHT is, “ideally, a linguistic theory of humor should determine and formulate the necessary and sufficient
10、 linguistic conditions for the text to be funny”( Raskin, 1985:47). A text can be characterized as a single-joke-carrying text if both of the conditions are satisfied:”the text is compatible, fully or in part, with two different scripts and, the two scripts with which the text is compatible are oppo
11、site” (Raskin, 1985:81). Here the script refers to a large chunk of semantic information surrounding the word or evoked by it. Therefore the “script” here contains more meanings than the lexical meanings offered by the dictionary. The opposition of the script is the most important element to influen
12、ce a joke. Attardo and Raskin cooperate with each other and set up a new theory named the “General Theory of Verbal Humor” (GTVH for short), which is a revision of Raskins SSHT. As Attardo puts forward:” whereas the SSHT was a semantic theory of humor, the GTVH is a linguistic theory for it includes
13、 other areas of linguistics as well, including , most notably, textual linguistics, the theory of narrativity, and pragmatics”(Attardo, 1994:222). Comparatively speaking, the GTVH contains more linguistics knowledge than the SSHT. Raskins Semantic Script Theory of Humor and its further developed ver
14、sion General Theory of Verbal humor are the two most influential theories on humor study from the perspective of linguistics.Coulson is the initiator who employs conceptual blending theory to study humor. In his paper” whats so funny? Conceptual integration in humorous examples” (2002), he paid much
15、 attention to the humorous examples from political cartoons, and aimed to explore the role of Conceptual integration in these examples. He focused on the cultural concepts involved in these examples, and examined how conceptual blending works. There is a special topic on humor study from the cogniti
16、ve linguistic way on the eighth International Cognitive Linguistics Association conference in 2003. G. Rithchies the Linguistic Analysis of Joke (2004) and Alan Partingtons the Linguistic of Laughter (2006) are the masterpieces of humor study in this field. G. Rithchie takes one subclass of joke-pun
17、- as example, aims to discover the inner generation mechanism of jokes. Partingtons work examines the phenomenon of “laughter-talk” with the assistance of language corpora. The author tries to investigate “what speakers try to achieve by engaging in laughter-talk and what both speakers and hearers m
18、at be signaling when then produce laughter” ( Partington, 2006:1)2.Linguistic Approaches on Verbal Humor Study at Home It was Lin Yutang, a great writer, who introduced the word “humor” for its current meaning in 1923. So humor study at home is relatively new, and scholars began to study language hu
19、mor from linguistic aspects in 1980s. From that time on, theories on humor take on a new look, and the studies on humors go further. Around the 1990s, humor studies concentrated on rhetoric. Hus Linguistics of Humor (1987) and Tans Humor and Language Humor (1997) are the representatives; both of the
20、 works are analyzing humor from the viewpoint of rhetoric. They take humor as a kind of rhetoric, and pay a lot attention to the rhetorical structures and techniques of humor; however, they overlook the internal mechanism, causation and process of humor. Many scholars pay attention to how the humor
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- 生活大爆炸 合作 原则 角度 分析 生活 大爆炸 中的 对话 幽默 英语论文
链接地址:https://www.31ppt.com/p-2326967.html