心理学方面的外文翻译.doc

《心理学方面的外文翻译.doc》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《心理学方面的外文翻译.doc（10页珍藏版）》请在三一办公上搜索。

1、毕业论文（设计）外 文 文 献 翻 译 译文题目：The Science Education Article Cultures学生姓名： 专 业： 指导教师： 2015年1月10日 The Science Education Article CulturesLongitudinal Study on Mental Health of University Students: Taking a Finance and Economics University for an Example / Li ZhejunAbstract Objective: To study the overall si

2、tuation and trend of freshmens mental health of finance and economics university in recent years. Methods: The University Personality Inventory (UPI) was used to test the 21 492 freshmen during 20092012 in Nan-jing University of Financeand Economics. Results: The mental health of students had a favo

3、rable development, the proportion of the students with serious mental health problems was among 6.95%8.38%, the proportion of the students with mental health problems was among 11.99%20.54%. Compared the answers of the key questions,the proportion of yes in boys was significantly higher than those i

4、n girls （ p0.05 ） ,the proprtion of older and younger students was higher than those in normal age （ p0.05）,the pro-prtion of ordinary universities students was higher than those in key university and independent college （ p0.05）, the top 10 mental health problems ware consistent in each grade. Conc

5、lu-sion: Colleges and universities should be insist in mental health survey in freshmen, improve mental health education, and focus on the groups with problems.Key words collegestudents;mentalhealth;UniversityPersonalityInventory （ UPI）;longitudinal studyTo fully understand the mental health of coll

6、ege students, build students mental file Case, so that psychological problems early detection, early intervention and early treatment, my school from 2009 Since the beginning of newborn psychological online survey to obtain a more comprehensive and accurate The data. To understand the mental health

7、of college freshmen in recent years, the overall Conditions and trends, this study will feed data 2009-2012 Statistical analysis1 Research Subjects and Methods1.1 Research SubjectsNanjing University of Finance 2009 -2012 years to participate in freshman psychology class 21,492 copies of census quest

8、ionnaires for the study. 2009 5014 people, Of which 1691 were boys and girls 3323 people; 2010 5107 people, including boys 1725 people, girls 3382 people; 2011 5774, of whom 1851 were boys, Girls 3923 people; 2012 5597, of whom 1669 were boys and girls 3928 people. The overall age of 15-23 years old

9、.1.2 MethodsUsing Mental Health Personality Questionnaire 1 (University Per-sonality Inventory, UPI) tool for the investigation, the questionnaire contains 64 questions, which The first is the measured pseudo 5,20,35,50 title, the first (61-64) for the secondary theme, the rest 56 questions, each qu

10、estion a points score between 0-56 points, the higher the score description heartThe more serious management problems. UPI screening classification criteria are as follows: The first category is satisfying Column one of those conditions: UPI score 25 points; the first 25 questions answered affirmati

11、vely; secondaryThere are at least two problems at the same time make sure to answer questions. The second category is the following conditions One by: score between 20-24 points; the first title to make sure the election 8,16,26 Optional; there is a problem in the secondary question affirmatively ch

12、oose. Does not belong to the first and second class were the first Three. The first category may have serious psychological problems, there may be a second class General psychological problems, the third category is the mental health of persons. Heart of the sea using a unified software online Surve

13、ying annually after admission The first two months were a time to complete the assessment within a week. 1.3Statistical AnalysisData were analyzed using SPSS16.0.2 The results2.1 UPI screening overall classification Form 1All grades UPI screening classification resultsA ClassB ClassC Classconsulting

14、 experienceGrade2009(n=5014)398(7.49%)1030(20.54%)3586(71.52%)35(0.70%)Grade2010(n=5107)428(8.38%)788(15.43%)3891(76.19%)34(0.67%)Grade2011(n=5774)441(7.64%)715(12.38%)4618(79.98%)45(0.78%)Grade2012(n=5597)389(6.95%)671(11.99%)4537(81.06%)35(0.63%)Sum(n=21492)1656(7.71%)3204(14.91%)16632(77.39%)149(

15、0.69%)As can be seen from Table 1, a class of students screened out at 6.95% distribution rate Between -8.38%, significantly higher than the four years 2010 2012 (p = 0.005), which He was no significant difference between the year of mental health from poor to good for, 2010 Class, 2009, 2011, 2012.

16、 II students sieve out ratio There was no significant difference between 2011 and 2012 between 11.99% -20.54% 2009 was significantly higher than that of 2010 (p 0.001), 2010 significantly higher than the 2011 level is explicitly Level (p 0.001). As can be seen, the maximum 2012 freshmen mental healt

17、h, The 2009 and 2010 are poor. From consulting experience point of view, four years is not made Health and significant change, had received psychological counseling for students ratio 0.63% -0. Between 78% and less quantity.2.2 Comparison of the total score for each grade UPI Form 2All grades UPI sc

18、ores of descriptive statisticsGrade2009Grade2010Grade2011GGrade2012MSD 11.4858.521 11.1218.7429.6918.6089.3058.501UPI average and standard score difference of all freshmen in Table 2, comparing the Grade scores are significantly different (F = 81.81, p 0.001), change over time Downward trend of the

19、show.2.3 Key topics differences in gender, age, on admission Form 3Sex differences in analysis of different age groups admission analyze key issuesTItle8 family died in the past and unfortunately16 Often insomnia25 Want to commit suicide26 Lack of interest in anythingComparison ProjectxpxpxpxpSex(ma

20、n or women)18.43505.1230.0243.8990.0485.1930.023Ages(19)20.45907.2750.0267.4510.0243.0930.213Admission line(First/Second/Third)7.320.0261.6450.4390.2160.8976.4250.04Table 3 shows that in the four key questions 8,15,25,26, gender differences Significantly, significantly worse than boys and girls. Wil

21、l be divided into three age groups, less than 18 years For the first group, the normal school age and that is not less than 18 years or less 19 The age of the second group, more than 19 years for the third group, comparing the three age groups Differences in the four questions. In the eighth title u

22、nfortunate, the older age group ( 19 Years old) to be significantly worse than the other two groups; in Question 16 Insomniacs small age group(18 years) was significantly better than the other two groups; in the first 25 questions wanted to commit suicide normal Age group (18-19 years old) was signi

23、ficantly better than the other two groups; in the first 26 questions each year There were no significant differences between age groups. Newborn admission can be divided into one, two, Three, to compare the differences in admission in question 4. In the eighth title is Unfortunately, and the first 2

24、6 questions, lack of interest , the two students were significantly worse than one This and three students; 16 and 15 had no significant problems in different online admissionDifferences.2.4 Ranked in the top ten four-issue projectsForm 4 UPI freshmen ranked in the top ten of psychological problemsT

25、itleMake sure to answerQualifyingGrade2009grade2010grade2011grade201261you think relationships are important20783112163Should be responsible for the personal sexual behavior20675221264Premarital sex is acceptable10882333358Care about others sight10069546553It cares for dirty10076455622Love worry9281

26、667962Loves purpose is to get married90451194452Anything not repeatedly confirmed not assured8929878757Total attention around8732789828Lack of patience803210101110As can be seen from Table 4, between four freshmen reflected the psychological ask Problem is relatively concentrated, a slight change in

27、 the individual topics, mainly in the love of The purpose of marriage is to increase the number of the affirmative answer, to care about dirty and The number of Love to worry about, the slightly reduced. For secondary question of affirmative response rate is extremely high, 1,2,3,7 were ranked in th

28、e first place.3 Discuss3.1 Freshmen overall mental health statusThrough four years of longitudinal comparative study, UPI screening rates in a class of students Between 6.95% -8.38%, two types of student screening rate of 11.99% -20.54% Room. Compare 2009 with 2010 vertical deviation, there may be t

29、he case with admission Some contact, higher admission line pressure may be more to their students. Previous phase Off The results show that a class of students in the detection rate of 11.35% -21.05%, two Students detection rate of 16.09% -34.09%. Compared speaking, our school a Students of the dete

30、ction rate significantly lower detection rate in addition to second-class students than in 2009, Lower than other schools, that I school freshmen mental health break Combined normal 7, and generally benign development. This may exist with students and discipline of a Given relation, my school class

31、for Financial Institutions, students mostly from Jiangsu and Anhui provinces, and more Number of relatively good economic conditions, and not far away from the home accessibility, both for Freshmen psychological adaptation to create a better environment. With the psychological Improve gradually in-d

32、epth understanding of the health and attention, and students mental health Is gradually improving. And for a second category of concern is the psychological work of students Carried out as an important part. 3.2 Focus on a few specific groups freshman classFirst, the boys feel unfortunate past, ofte

33、n insomnia, have suicidal thoughts And the lack of interest rate significantly higher than the number of girls. Financial institutions often Appear in the overall proportion of gender imbalance, showing women more than men and less the case, so Pay attention to the boys mental health issues is parti

34、cularly important. Secondly, more than 19 years into the Students learn more feel is unfortunate, and there are more suicide Idea; less than 18 years old enrolled in the sleep better, but the idea of suicide are moreMore. It can be seen in older freshmen may have had unusual people Student experienc

35、e, such as illness, video and so on, they have a greater psychological shadow Sound, need extra attention; and young freshmen may not mind Cooked, the situation Destructive Enthusiasm, their ideas should also be a teacher understanding and off Note. Finally, two students showed a lack of interest an

36、d more on their own do not feel Fortunately, this can be in the middle ground with them, there are a lot of unknowns in the choice and fans Mang related to education in the daily need to be guided, and gradually cultivate interest And find their own direction.3.3 Focus on several types of psychologi

37、cal concernsComprehensive view of four freshmen year focused psychological problems can be divided into the following several Aspects: first, the interpersonal relationships, relationships that are important to care about him Peoples views, as well as attention to the people around; second, love and

38、 sexual aspects, reflecting the Openness and accountability; third, forcing tendency reflected in the dirty really care, repeatedly Confirmation and worry about love; fourth, the lack of patience. When these problems with a strong Generation feature, there is the social environment, family education

39、, a certain relationship, which is to To study also has similar results 6. This is mental health education mention For a basis, but also pointed out the priorities and direction of the work.3.4 Suggestions and StrategiesIn recent years, our school freshman psychology successive census carried out wo

40、rk for the establishment of Archives and psychology student mental health education provides a rich data support Holders, but also for the psychological problems of students played an important role in prevention. Polytechnic mind To carry out the process for the boys as well as pay attention to sch

41、ool age is too large or too small new Health and mental health. Widespread problem for college students to carry out psychological Lectures to freshmen universal psychological knowledge, conducted group counseling training to help new Students get along better coordination between heterosexual relat

42、ionships and the psychological counseling Penetrate into student work, and to let more students to receive counseling, benefit from counseling Consultation. In short, to let in a variety of activities in the students involved, self-discovery Himself, to know themselves, assert themselves, cultivate

43、good psychological quality.大学生心理健康水平状况纵向研究以某财经大学为例李喆君摘要目的：为了解近年来财经类大学新生的心理健康的总体情况及变化趋势。方法：采用大学生人格问卷（UPI）对南京财经大学2009级2012级新生共计21492人进行测试。结果：学生心理健康状况逐年呈良性健康发展，可能存在严重心理问题的学生占当年入学新生的比率在6.95%8.38%之间，可能存在心理问题的学生比率在11.99%20.54%之间；在关键题项上，男生比率显著高于女生（p0.05），大龄和低龄入学新生比率显著高于正常年龄（p0.05），二本新生比率显著高于一本和三本新生（p0.05）；

44、各级新生排名前10位的心理问题较为一致。结论：要坚持做好新生心理普查工作，并完善心理健康教育的各项工作，对于重点人群给予特别关注。关键词：大学生心理健康UPI纵向研究为全面了解大学生的心理健康状况，建立学生心理档案，做到心理问题的早发现、早干预、早治疗，我校从2009年起开始对新生进行网上心理普查，获得了更加全面准确的数据资料。为了解近年来大学新生心理健康状况的总体情况及变化趋势，本研究将对2009-2012年的数据资料进行统计分析。1 研究对象及方法1.1 研究对象以南京财经大学2009级-2012级历年参加新生心理普查的有效问卷21492份作为研究对象。2009级5014人，其中男生169

45、1人，女生3323人；2010级5107人，其中男生1725人，女生3382人；2011级5774人，其中男生1851人，女生3923人；2012级5597人，其中男生1669人，女生3928人。总体年龄15-23岁。1.2 研究方法采用大学生心理健康人格调查问卷1（University Per-sonality Inventory，UPI）为调查工具，该问卷包含64题，其中第5、20、35、50为测伪题，第61、62、63、64为辅助题，其余的56题，每题1分，总分在0-56分之间，分数越高说明心理问题越严重。UPI的筛查分类标准如下：第一类为满足下列条件之一者：UPI总分25分；第25题作

46、肯定回答；辅助题中同时至少有2题做肯定回答。第二类为满足下列条件之一者：总分介于20-24分之间；第8、16、26 题做肯定选择。辅助题中有1题做肯定选择。不属于第一、二类者为第三类。其中第一类可能存在严重心理问题，第二类可能存在一般心理问题，第三类为心理健康者。用心海软件网上进行统一施测，每年均在入学后的第二个月进行，每次在一周内完成测评。1.3 统计分析采用SPSS16.0对数据进行分析。2 结果2.1UPI筛查分类的总体情况表1各年级UPI筛查分类结果（人数及百分比）一类二类三类2009级(n=5014)398(7.49%)1030(20.54%)3586(71.52%)35(0.70%

47、)2010级(n=5107)428(8.38%)788(15.43%)3891(76.19%)34(0.67%)2011级(n=5774)441(7.64%)715(12.38%)4618(79.98%)45(0.78%)2012级(n=5597)389(6.95%)671(11.99%)4537(81.06%)35(0.63%)总计(n=21492)1656(7.71%)3204(14.91%)16632(77.39%)149(0.69%)从表1可以看出，一类学生的筛出比率分布在6.95%-8.38%之间，四年间2010级显著高于2012级（p=0.005），其他年份之间均无显著差异，心理健康水平从差到好为，2010级、2009级、2011级、2012级。二类学生的筛出比率在11.9