shetpptFAMUFSU College of EngineeringFlorida State University.ppt

《shetpptFAMUFSU College of EngineeringFlorida State University.ppt》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《shetpptFAMUFSU College of EngineeringFlorida State University.ppt（18页珍藏版）》请在三一办公上搜索。

1、AMML,Modeling of CNT based composites:Numerical IssuesN.Chandra and C.Shet FAMU-FSU College of Engineering,Florida State University,Tallahassee,FL 32310,AMML,Objective,To develop an analytical model that can predict the mechanical properties of short-fiber composites with imperfect interfaces.To stu

2、dy the effect of interface bond strength on critical bond length lc To study the effect of bond strength on mechanical properties of composites.,Approach,To model the interface as cohesive zones,which facilitates to introduce a range of interface properties varying from zero binding to perfect bindi

3、ng,AMML,Shear Lag Model*,Prelude 1,The governing DEWhose solution is given byWhere Disadvantages The interface stiffness is dependent on Youngs modulus of matrix and fiber,hence it may not represent exact interface property.k remains invariant with deformation Cannot model imperfect interfaces,*Orig

4、inal model developed by Cox 1 and Kelly 2,1 Cox,H.L.,J.Appl.Phys.1952;Vol.3:p.72 2 Kelly,A.,Strong Soilids,2nd Ed.,Oxford University Press,1973,Chap.5.,AMML,Prelude 2,Cohesive Zone Model,CZM is represented by traction-displacement jump curves to model the separating surfacesAdvantagesCZM can create

5、new surfaces.Maintains continuity conditions mathematically,despite the physical separation.CZM represents physics of the fracture process at the atomic scale.Eliminates singularity of stress and limits it to the cohesive strength of the the material.It is an ideal framework to model strength,stiffn

6、ess and failure in an integrated manner.,Modified Shear lag Model,The governing DEIf the interface between fiber and matrix is represented by cohesive zone,then,Evaluating constants by using boundary conditions,stresses in fiber is given by,AMML,Comparison between Original and Modified Shear Lag Mod

7、el,Variation of stress-strain response in the elastic limit with respect to parameter b,The parameter b defined by defines the interface strength in two models through variable k.In original model In modified model interface stiffness is given by slope of traction-displacement curve given by In orig

8、inal model k is invariant with loading and it cannot be variedIn modified model k can be varied to represent a range of values from perfect to zero bonding,Comparison with Experimental Result,The average stress in fiber and matrix far a applied strain e is given by,Then by rule of mixture the stress

9、 in composites can be obtained as,Fig.A typical traction-displacement curve used for interface between SiC fiber and 6061-Al matrix,For SiC-6061-T6-Al composite interface is modeled by CZM model given by,With N=5,and k0=1,k1=10,k2=-36,k3=72,k4=-59,k5=12.Taking smax=1.8 sy,where sy is yield stress of

10、 matrix and dmax=0.06 dc,Fig.Comparison of experimental 1 stress-strain curve for Sic/6061-T6-Al composite with stress-strain curves predicted from original shear lag model and CZM based Shear lag model.,1 Dunn,M.L.and Ledbetter,H.,Elastic-plastic behavior of textured short-fiber composites,Acta mat

11、er.1997;45(8):3327-3340,The constitutive behavior of 6061-T6 Al matrix 21 can be represented by,Comparison(contd.),yield stress=250 MPa,and hardening parameters h=173 MPa,n=0.46.Youngs modulus of matrix is 76.4 GPa.Youngs modulus of SiC fiber is Ef of 423 GPa,Result comparison,Experimental 1 Youngs

12、modulus is 105 GPa and failure strength is around 515 MPa,FEAModel,The CNT is modeled as a hollow tube with a length of 200,outer radius of 6.98 and thickness of 0.4.CNT modeled using 1596 axi-symmetric elements.Matrix modeled using 11379 axi-symmetric elements.Interface modeled using 399 4 node axi

13、symmetric CZ elements with zero thickness,Comparison with Numerical Results,Fig.(a)Finite element mesh of a quarter portion of unit model(b)a enlarged portion of the mesh near the curved cap of CNT,AMML,Longitudinal Stress in fiber at different strain level,Interface strength=5000 MPa Interface stre

14、ngth=50 MPa,AMML,Shear Stress in fiber at different strain level,Interface strength=5000 MPa Interface strength=50 MPa,Critical Bond Length,Table 1.Critical bond lengths for short fibers of length 200 and for different interface strengths and interface displacement parameter dmax1 value 0.15.,Critic

15、al bond length varies with interface property(Cohesive zone parameters(smax,dmax1)When the external diameter of a solid fiber is the same as that of a hollow fiber,then,for any given length the load carried by solid fiber is more than that of hollow fiber.Thus,it requires a longer critical bond leng

16、th to transfer the load At higher dmax1 the longitudinal fiber stress when the matrix begins to yield is lower,hence critical bond length reducesFor solid cylindrical fibers,at low interface strength of 50 MPa,when the fiber length is 600 and above,the critical bond length on each end of the fiber e

17、xceeds semi-fiber length for some values dmax1 tending the fiber ineffective in transferring the load,interface strength is 5000MPa,interface strength is 50MPa,AMML,Table:Variation of Youngs modulus of the composite with matrix youngs modulus,volume fraction and interface strength,Effect of interfac

18、e strength on stiffness of Composites,Youngs Modulus(stiffness)of the composite not only increases with matrix stiffness and fiber volume fraction,but also with interface strength,Effect of interface strength on strength of Composites,Table Yield strength(in MPa)of composites for different volume fr

19、action and interface strength,Fiber volume fraction=0.02,Fiber volume fraction=0.05,Yield strength(when matrix yields)of the composite increases with fiber volume fraction(and matrix stiffness)but also with interface strengthWith higher interface strength hardening modulus and post yield strength in

20、creases considerably,Effect of interface displacement parameter dmax1 on strength and stiffness,Fig.Variation of stiffness of composite material with interface displacement parameter dmax1 for different interface strengths.,Fig.Variation of yield strength of the composite material with interface dis

21、placement parameter dmax1 for different interface strengths.,As the slope of T-d curve decreases(with increase in dmax1),the overall interface property is weakened and hence the stiffness and strength reduces with increasing values of dmax1.When the interface strength is 50 MPa and fiber length is s

22、mall the youngs modulus and yield strength of the composite material reaches a limiting value of that of matrix material.,Effect of length of the fiber on strength and stiffness,Fig.Variation of yield strength of the composite material with different fiber lengths and different interface strengths,F

23、ig.Variation of Youngs modulus of the composite material with different fiber lengths and for different interface strengths,For a given volume fraction the composite material can attain optimum values for mechanical properties irrespective of interface strength.For composites with stronger interface

24、 the optimum possible values can be obtained with smaller fiber length With low interface strength longer fiber lengths are required to obtain higher composite properties.During processing it is difficult to maintain longer CNT fiber straigth.,AMML,Conclusion,The critical bond length or ineffective

25、fiber length is affected by interface strength.Lower the interface strength higher is the ineffective length.In addition to volume fraction and matrix stiffness,interface property,length and diameter of the fiber also affects elastic modulus of composites.Stiffness and yield strength of the composite increases with increase in interface strength.In order to exploit the superior properties of the fiber in developing super strong composites,interfaces need to be engineered to have higher interface strength.,