急性缺血性卒中溶栓治疗课件.pptx

《急性缺血性卒中溶栓治疗课件.pptx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《急性缺血性卒中溶栓治疗课件.pptx（72页珍藏版）》请在三一办公上搜索。

1、急性缺血性卒中溶栓治疗,急性缺血性卒中溶栓治疗,概述,静脉溶栓组织纤溶酶原激活物(tPA) NINDSECASS I & II, ATLANTIS链激酶 MAST-I, MAST-E, ASK动脉溶栓前循环: 大脑中动脉 (PROACT II)后循环: 基底动脉,概述静脉溶栓,与安慰剂相比,3h内IV rtPA (0、9 mg/kg) 能改善90天时的预后出血发生率为 6、4% ,安慰剂为 0、6% ,但死亡率无差异所有亚组预后均优于安慰剂组益处可持续1年,rt-PA :NINDS,与安慰剂相比,3h内IV rtPA (0、9 mg/kg),随机, 多中心, 双盲, 安慰剂对比620例; 排除

2、CT早期梗塞灶 (预后不良)干预rtPA (1、1 mg/kg) vs、 placebo起病6h内 主要终点Barthel Index and modified Rankin Scale at 90 daysrtPA 与安慰剂组无明显差别,rt-PA : ECASS I,Hacke et al、, JAMA、 1995;274:1017-1025,随机, 多中心, 双盲, 安慰剂对比rt-PA : ECAS,随机, 多中心, 双盲, 安慰剂对比800 例;排除CT早期明显梗塞灶 干预rtPA (0、9 mg/kg) vs、 placebo起病6h内 主要终点modified Rankin Sc

3、ale Score of 1 at 90 daysrtPA 与安慰剂组无明显差别,rt-PA : ECASS II,Hacke et al、, Lancet、 1998;352:1245-1251,随机, 多中心, 双盲, 安慰剂对比rt-PA : ECAS,随机, 多中心, 双盲, 安慰剂对比613例干预rtPA (0、9 mg/kg) vs、 placebo起病3-5h内 主要终点NIHSS of 1 at 90 daysrtPA 与安慰剂组无明显差别,rt-PA : ATLANTISAlteplase Thrombolysis for Acute Noninterventional Rx

4、 in Isch Stroke,Clark et al、, JAMA、 1999;282:2019-2026,随机, 多中心, 双盲, 安慰剂对比rt-PA : ATLA,rt-PA:小结,与安慰剂相比,3h内IV rtPA (0、9 mg/kg) 能改善90天时的预后、 I 类证据目前证据显示,超过3h 予IV tPA 无效、 I 类证据,rt-PA:小结与安慰剂相比,3h内IV rtPA (0、,链激酶(SK),与安慰剂相比,6h内予IV SK 1、5 MU 预后不良 (出血和死亡率高)、 I 类证据,链激酶(SK)研究药物剂量治疗窗结果Multicenter,动脉溶栓,前循环大脑中动脉阻

5、塞后循环椎基底动脉阻塞,动脉溶栓前循环,与安慰剂相比, 6h内予IA ProUK 经造影证实MCA M1 或M2 段阻塞的患者有效、 I 类证据15% 绝对有效 (number needed to treat = 7)增加颅内出血,死亡率无差异,PROACT II:小结,与安慰剂相比, 6h内予IA ProUK 经造影证实MCA,急性椎基底动脉阻塞,数项病例报道 (IV、V 类证据)非随机化无对比组 Brandt et al、, Cerebrovasc Dis, 1995;5:182-7,急性椎基底动脉阻塞数项病例报道 (IV、V 类证据),小结,3h内静脉用 tPA 能降低90天时的残障功能

6、、 I类证据静脉用链激酶 (1、5 MU) 增加出血和死亡率、 I类证据6h内动脉用尿激酶前体(Pro-UK,未被FDA通过)能降低90天时的残障功能、 I类证据有证据支持在急性椎基底动脉阻塞中应用动脉溶栓、 IV、V类证据,小结3h内静脉用 tPA 能降低90天时的残障功能、 I类,急性缺血性卒中抗凝治疗,急性缺血性卒中抗凝治疗,概述,肝素LMW heparinLMW heparinoid,-作用于抗凝血酶 III (抑制凝血因子 IIa, IXa, and Xa),1 effect on Xa reduced plt interaction longer half-life simpler

7、 to administer lower bleeding risk reduced effect on IIa,概述肝素-作用于抗凝血酶 III 1 effect o,Summary: trial results,Summary: trial resultsNdrugres,各卒中亚型急性抗凝治疗,房颤 和心源性栓塞大动脉粥样硬化椎基底动脉阻塞 TIA进展性卒中动脉夹层静脉血栓形成,各卒中亚型急性抗凝治疗 房颤 和心源性栓塞,各卒中亚型急性抗凝治疗:小结,各卒中亚型急性抗凝治疗:小结CCTsubgrpNresult,小结,急性期抗凝减少深静脉血栓和肺栓塞发生,不增加颅内出血几率、I类证据,小

8、结急性期抗凝减少深静脉血栓和肺栓塞发生,不增加颅内出血几,急性缺血性卒中阿司匹林治疗,急性缺血性卒中阿司匹林治疗,International Stroke Strial (IST),ASA 300 mg/d x 2 wks begun within 48 hrs,* p、01,International Stroke Strial (,Chinese Acute Stroke Trial (CAST)Lancet 1997;349:1641,ASA 160 mg/d x4 wks begun within 48 hrs,* p、05,Chinese Acute Stroke Trial (CA

9、,小结,基于 IST 和 CAST, 阿司匹林在急性缺血性卒中后2-4周内,每1000例患者中有10人可减少死亡和复发。,小结基于 IST 和 CAST, 阿司匹林在急性缺血性卒中,非心源性卒中二级预防:抗栓治疗,非心源性卒中二级预防:抗栓治疗,概述,抗血小板药Antiplatelet、阿司匹林Aspirin抵克立得(噻氯匹啶)Ticlid (Ticlopidine)波力维(氯吡格雷)Plavix (Clopidogrel)艾诺思Aggrenox (aspirin + extended-release dipyridamole)Warfarin for non-cardioembolic ar

10、terial stroke: including large vessel disease、抗磷脂抗体综合征(ASP)、颈椎动脉夹层、,概述抗血小板药Antiplatelet、,Aspirin,Aspirin,高剂量阿司匹林随机对比试验,* Risk of vascular events (death, stroke, MI) in the control group,高剂量阿司匹林随机对比试验#StudyASA dose# o,低剂量阿司匹林随机对比试验,* Vascular events (death, MI, stroke) in placebo、 * stroke in placebo

11、,低剂量阿司匹林随机对比试验#Study ASA dose i,Antiplatelet Trialists,100,000 pts from 145 trials、All antiplatelet agents were included、Clumped all vascular events together、Overall odds reduction for vascular events was 25%、For pts with minor stroke or TIA (18 trials) antiplatelet agents led to odds reduction of 2

12、2% for vascular events and 23% for nonfatal stroke、Did not answer questions about aspirin dose、Used odds ratio instead of relative risk、Used all antiplatelet agents、,Antiplatelet Trialists100,000,Is there a consensus、,The FDA reviewed trials of aspirin vs placebo (including ESPS-2, SALT, and UK-TIA

13、trials) to reduce the risk of stroke and death in patients with prior TIA or stroke、“The positive findings at lower dosages (eg, 50, 75, and 300 mg daily), along with the higher incidence of side effects expected at the higher dosage (eg, 1,300 mg daily), are sufficient reason to lower the dosage of

14、 aspirin for subjects with TIA and ischemic stroke、”For “ischemic stroke and TIA: 50 to 325 mg aspirin once a day、 Continue therapy indefinitely、”,FDA、 Federal Register、 1998;63:56802、,Is there a consensus、 The FDA,Ticlopidine,Ticlopidine,TASS Study: Efficacy*, 3-year study endpoints, N = 3,069、,End

15、pointStrokeStroke, MI, orvascular death,RRR21%9%,(P = 0、024),Hass et al、 N Engl J Med、 1989;321:501、 Easton、 In Hass and Easton (eds)、 Ticlopidine, Platelets and Vascular Disease、 New York: Springer-Verlag; 1993:141、,* Ticlopidine (250 mg bid) vs ASA (650 mg bid)、,(NS),TASS Study: Efficacy* 3-year,T

16、iclopidine (%),Aspirin (%),DiarrheaRashNauseaGastritis, ulcer, GI bleedingSevere neutropenia (ANC 450/mm3)Cerebral hemorrhage,20、4*11、9*11、1 2、10、9*0、6,9、85、210、2 6、0*0、00、7,*P 0、05,TASS Study: Side Effects,Adapted from Hass et al、 N Engl J Med、 1989;321:501、,Ticlopidine (%)Aspirin (%)Diar,Clopidogr

17、il,Clopidogril,CAPRIE StudyEfficacy of Clopidogrel vs、 Aspirin (n = 19,185)Primary Oute: MI, Ischemic Stroke, or Vascular Death,Months of Follow-Up,Cumulative Event Rate (%),0,4,8,12,16,Clopidogrel,Aspirin,0,3,6,9,12,15,18,21,24,27,30,33,36,Aspirin5、83%,5、32%Clopidogrel,Event Rate per Year,*P = 0、04

18、3,CAPRIE Steering mittee、 Lancet 1996;348:1329-1339、,ARR= 0、51NNT= 1/0、005= 196,CAPRIE StudyEfficacy of Clopi,Clopidogrel (%),ASA (%),GI plaintsAny bleeding disorderRashDiarrheaGI bleedingIntracranial hemorrhage,1、901、200、90*0、420、520、21,2、41*1、370、410、270、93*0、33,*P 0、05,CAPRIE Steering mittee、 Lan

19、cet、 1996;348:1329-1339、,Side Effects causing discontinuation of drug,CAPRIE Study,Clopidogrel (%)ASA (%)GI plain,Management of Atherothrombosis with Clopidogrel in High-risk patients(MATCH),氯吡格雷(75mg)+阿司匹林(75mg)与单用氯吡格雷(75mg)的疗效进行比较 ,结果是失败的两组的主要终点指标,即缺血性卒中、心肌梗死和血管源性死亡发生率与急性缺血事件(心绞痛、周围动脉症状恶化或TIA)无统计学

20、差异 联合治疗同时增加了严重出血的概率,Management of Atherothrombosis,The Second European Stroke Prevention Study:ESPS-2,Tested efficacy of ASA/ER-DP for secondary stroke preventionAddressed clinical questionsDoes low-dose ASA prevent stroke?Does ER-DP prevent stroke?Is ASA/ER-DP superior to ASA alone? To ER-DP alone?

21、Is ASA/ER-DP well tolerated?,The ESPS-2 Group、 J Neurol Sci、 1997;151:S3、 Diener et al、 J Neurol Sci、 1996;143:1、,The Second European Stroke Pre,ESPS-2 Results: Stroke Rates at 24 Months,Placebo,ASA,ER-DP,ASA/ER-DP,0,4,8,12,16,15、2%,12、5%,12、8%,9、5%,Incidence (%),ARR= 5、7 over PlaceboNNT= 1/0、057= 1

22、7、5,ESPS-2 Results: Stroke Rates,ESPS-2 : Side Effect Profile,Placebo ASA ASA+EDGI Event*28、1% 30、4%32、8%Headache*32、3%33、1%38、1%Bleeding *4、5%8、2%8、7%(any site)Lightheadedness 30、9%29、1%29、5%*=P0、05,ESPS-2 : Side Effect Profile,Meta-Analysis: ASA/DP vs ASA,Adapted from Diener、 Neurology、 1998;51(su

23、ppl 3):S17、,TrialsToulouse TIA (N = 284)AICLA (N = 400)ACCSG (N = 890)ESPS-2 (N = 3,299)Overall (N = 4,873) 15% RRR,Relative Risk(of stroke, MI, or vascular death),0、5,1,1、5,2,2、5,3,ASA/DP Better,ASA Better,Meta-Analysis: ASA/DP vs ASAAd,Prevention Regimen for Effectively Avoiding Second Strokes(PRo

24、FESS),是由30个国家参入,纳入18500例患者,为期4年的随机双盲多中心试验,直截了当比较艾诺思Aggrenox(双嘧达莫缓释剂200mg+阿司匹林25mg,ER-DP200mg+ASA 25mg,2次/d)与氯吡格雷(75mg,1次/d)在卒中二级预防中的疗效,预期结果将在2008年报道。,Prevention Regimen for Effecti,Warfarin-Aspirin Recurrent Stroke Study(WARSS),2206 patients followed for 2 years IS or Death Mjr bleed /100 pt-yrsWarf

25、arin 17、8% 2、22Aspirin 16、0% 1、49,p=、25,No significant difference between warfarin and aspirin,Warfarin-Aspirin Recurrent Str,The Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease study(WASID),多中心前瞻性随机双盲试验 华法林INR为23,阿司匹林为1300mg两组的卒中发生率和血管源性病死率无统计学差异华法林组出血并发症的发生率较高促使试验提早终止,The Warfarin-Aspirin Sympto

26、matic Intracranial Disease Study、Neurology、 1995 Aug;45(8):1488-93、,The Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomat,Effect of Treatment on Recurrent Ischemic Stroke and Death At Two Years in APASS/WARSS(Brey, RL: presented at the 27 International Stroke Conference, San Antonio, TX, February 9, 2002),Primary Endpoint

27、 (%),抗磷脂抗体阳性组与阴性组无差异,阿司匹林与华法林无差异,Effect of Treatment on Recurre,颈动脉和椎动脉夹层,Natural history of carotid dissection: (Hart et al Neurol Clin North Am 1:155, 1983)Cerebral infarction in 33% (23% minor, 10% major or fatal、TIA in 45; Head and neck pain in 16%; Pulsatile tinnitus 4%; and bruit in 2%、Proper

28、management is controversial、 Most pts do well, either because of or despite treatment、,颈动脉和椎动脉夹层Natural history of ca,心源性卒中预防:抗血栓治疗,心源性卒中预防:抗血栓治疗,心源性卒中估计病因,Valvular heart disease心脏瓣膜病Rheumatic mitral valve disease风湿性二尖瓣病Prosthetic heart valves人工心脏瓣膜Mitral valve prolapse二尖瓣脱垂Aortic valve disease主动脉瓣病

29、Aortic arch atherosclerosis主动脉弓粥样硬化Endocarditis (infective or nonbacterial thrombotic)心内膜炎(感染性或非细菌性血栓)Atrial fibrillation心房颤动Myocardial infarction心肌梗死Left ventricular dysfunction左心室功能不全Patent foramen ovale卵圆孔未闭,心源性卒中估计病因Valvular heart diseas,Rheumatic mitral valve disease:2 stroke prevention,No rand

30、omized trialsObservational studies: OAC reduce recurrent embolic events/fatal events by 2/3 or more1-3Extrapolation from 1 large randomized study in NVAF (EAFT) provides additional data for patients with RHD + AF (but RHD excluded),1 Szekely P BMJ 1964;1:209-12 2Adams GF et al JNNP 1974;37:378-833Fl

31、eming 47:599-604,Level III-IV: Benefit of OAC,Rheumatic mitral valve disease,Prosthetic heart valves: mechanical valves1 stroke prevention,Observational data: APA may be sufficient to prevent embolism in absence of AF, but OAC needed to prevent valve thrombosis1-2RCT: addition of ASA 100 mg to warfa

32、rin (INR 3-4、5) cerebral embolism (4/186 vs、 12/184)3NonRCT: addition of ASA 500 mg tripled risk of major hemorrhage (14% vs、 5%)4,Level I evidence: benefit of OAC + ASA over OAC alone,1 Hartz R et al J Thorac CV Surg 1986;92:684-902Ribeiro P et al J Thorac CV Surg 1986;91:92-83 Turpie A et al NEJM

33、1993;329:524-94Chesebro J et al Am J Card 1983;51:1537-41,Prosthetic heart valves: mecha,Prosthetic heart valves: mechanical valves2 stroke prevention,No direct dataACCP remendations: OAC + baby ASA based on extrapolation of 1 prevention data,6th ACCP Consensus Conference on Antithrombotic Therapy 2

34、001,Prosthetic heart valves: mecha,Prosthetic heart valves:bioprosthetic valves,1Nunez et al Ann Thorac Surg 1982;33:354-8,But no difference in embolic rate with OAC (4、6%, 7/260) in parison to ASA (3、7%, 5/135), and significantly higher rate of hemorrhagic plications (5、5% vs、 0、4%)1 (Interestingly

35、, low rate of late embolism in pts with AF despite lack of chronic AC in both of these studies,1 prevention: Level IV evidence: benefit of early OAC over no OAC Level V evidence: no difference between OAC & ASA2 prevention: no evidence,Prosthetic heart valves:biopr,Mitral Valve Prolapse : 2 stroke p

36、revention,Level V evidence: neither ASA nor AC pletely effective,Stroke recurrence in MVP: case series,MVP + AF: extrapolate data from EAFT,1Watson RT Neurol 1979;29:886-92Hanson M et al Stroke 1980;11:499-506,Mitral Valve Prolapse : 2 str,Atherosclerosis of the thoracic aorta:benefit of OAC,50 pati

37、ents with atheroma 4mmLevel III: benefit,34 patients with mobile atheromaLevel III: benefit,Ferrari E et al JACC 1999;33:1317-22,Atherosclerosis of the thoraci,主动脉弓粥样硬化Tunick P et al Am J Cardiol 2002;90:1320-5,Level III evidence: benefit of statins,主动脉弓粥样硬化Tunick P et al Am J C,主动脉弓粥样硬化: OACTunick

38、P et al Am J Cardiol 2002;90:1320-5,Level III evidence: no benefit of OAC,主动脉弓粥样硬化: OACTunick P et al A,主动脉弓粥样硬化: APATunick P et al Am J Cardiol 2002;90:1320-5,Level III evidence: no benefit of APA,主动脉弓粥样硬化: APATunick P et al A,主动脉弓粥样硬化: 他汀类Tunick P et al Am J Cardiol 2002;90:1320-5,Level III eviden

39、ce: benefit of statins,主动脉弓粥样硬化: 他汀类Tunick P et al A,1 stroke prevention Retrospective data show no benefit of OAC for native valve endocarditis, benefit for prosthetic valve endocarditis1-52 stroke prevention: No data,感染性心内膜炎,1Davenport et al Stroke 1990;21:993-92Paschalis et al Eur Neurol 1990;30:

40、87-9 3Yeh et al Circulation 1967;35:I77-814Delahaye et al Eur Heart J 1990;11:1074-85Wilson et al Circulation 1978;57:1004-7,Level V evidence,1 stroke prevention 感染性心内膜炎1D,? Pathogenesis: fibrin thrombi deposits on valves assoc with coagulopathy (usually DIC)Reported incidence of embolism varies (14

41、-91%)Rx: Retrospective data suggest benefit of heparin, but not OAC1-368% with recurrent emboli when heparin d/cdICH risk lower than in infective endocarditis,1Rogers et al Am J Med 1987;83:746-562Lopez et al Am Heart J 1987;113:773-843Sack et al Medicine 1977;56:1-37,非细菌性血栓性心内膜炎,Level V evidence: n

42、o benefit of OAC;benefit of heparin in Trousseau syndrome (mainly with DIC),? Pathogenesis: fibrin thromb,European Atrial Fibrillation Trial:EAFT (Lancet 1993;342:1255-1262),Oral anticoagulants (225) vs、 Aspirin (230) HR (95%CI)1 Endpoint0、60 (、41 - 、87)All stroke0、38 (、23 - 、64)Bleeding2、8 (1、7 - 4

43、、8) Major bleeding OAC 2、8%/yr vs、 ASA 0、9%/yr,Level I Evidence: benefit of OAC,European Atrial Fibrillation T,Optimum INR for prevention of 2 stroke associated with atrial fibrillation(EAFT NEJM 1995;333:5-10),“The target value for the INR should be set at 3、0”,Optimum INR for prevention of,Stroke

44、Prevention with the ORal direct Thrombin Inhibitor in patients with non-valvular atrial Fibrillation(SPORTIF),SPORTIF III是一项开放试验 , SPORTIF V期是随机双盲多中心试验 ;比较了口服直截了当凝血酶抑制剂西美加群(ximelagatran)与华法林(INR23)对心房颤动罹患卒中的影响 ;两组预防缺血性卒中的疗效无统计学差异,华法林组并发出血的概率较高,西美加群组肝酶升高发生率为6%,比华法林组(0、8%)高特别多,这也是尚未获得美国FDA批准的原因。,Strok

45、e Prevention with the ORa,心肌梗死后一级预防: 短期抗凝,Pre-thrombolytic eraHeparin decreases stroke incidence 1-3Heparin decreases mural thrombus 4,1Med Research Council BMJ 1969;1:335-422Drapkin 22:100-9,心肌梗死后一级预防: 短期抗凝Pre-thrombolyti,心肌梗死后一级预防: 短期抗凝,Post-thrombolytic erabaseline rates of death, reinfarction, s

46、troke, & PE markedly lower with thrombolytics & ASAaddition of heparin/LMWH may decrease mural thrombus formation, but increases risk of major bleeding without further reducing stroke risk,1Collins et al BMJ 1996;313:652-9 2Collins et al NEJM 1997;336:847-603FRAMI Kontny et al JACC 1997;30:962-94SCA

47、TI Lancet 1989;2:182-65Gissi-2 Vecchio et al Circulation 1991;84:512-9,心肌梗死后一级预防: 短期抗凝Post-thrombolyt,心肌梗死后一级预防: 长期抗凝,Relative to control, coumarins in moderate or high dose (INR 2-4、8)Significantly decrease stroke incidenceSignificantly increase incidence of major bleeding,Anand 282:2058-67,心肌梗死后一级

48、预防: 长期抗凝Relative to con,Modified from Anand 282:2058-67,But no benefit relative to ASA,Incidence of stroke,and significant increase in major bleeding,Modified from Anand & Yusuf JA,RR (95%CI)Anticoagulation * 、19 (、13 - 、27)Aspirin # 、44 (、29 - 、65),Level III evidence: benefit of AC ASA for 1 preven

49、tion,左心室功能不全 :卒中危险因子多变量分析(Loh E et al NEJM 1997;336:251-257),* similar risk at all levels of EF40%# similar risk at all levels of EF35%,RR,Rate (Events/ 100 Pt-Yr)Anticoagulation 0 (0/40)No Anticoagulation 0、35 (1/288),Low Risk for Primary Occurrence,慢性室壁瘤系统栓塞(Lapeyre AC et al JACC 1985;6:534-538),R

50、ate (Events/ 100 Pt-Yr)L,Patent Foramen Ovale in Cryptogenic Stroke Study (PICSS)(Homma S et al Circulation 2002;105:2625-31),Design: Prospective, randomized, double- blind, multi-center clinical trial Eligibility: Enrolled in WARSSAgree to have additional TEETreatment: Warfarin (target INR 1、4-2、8,