数字化图书馆约翰霍普金斯大学的计划和实践.ppt

Digital Library Initiatives-Planning and Practice Johns Hopkins University数字化图书馆约翰 霍普金斯大学的计划和实践,Tonights Agenda今日日程,My presentation about 30 minutes 讲演大约30分钟Scope of todays discussion:a sample of case study,just a taste!今天讨论的范畴：只是一个案例分析的样板。Introduction to the case study method 介绍案例分析的方法Introduction to JHU“case”介绍约翰 霍普金斯大学“案例”Overview of JHU,and its libraries 简介约翰 霍普金斯大学及其图书馆Overview of Hopkins DL initiatives 简介霍普金斯数字图书馆革新What are available resources?有什么可使用资源？What are recommendations?有何建议？,Tonights Agenda(Cond)今日日程,Discussion and group activity 讨论和分组活动Discussion should focus on:strategic,philosophical,creative,organizational,and imaginative!Dont worry about:implementation details.讨论的重点是：战略性,务虚,创新性、组织性、以及想象性！不要太关心：实施的细节。Divide group by topics 分组讨论Option and Recommendation analysis template 分析的模板Small group report back to large group 小组讨论汇报My role:a discussion facilitator,not a teacher!我的角色：讨论的组织者，而不是一个老师！Your role:a participant,not a student!你的角色:参与者,而不是一个学生!Time allocation:1).30 minutes presentation,2).30 minutes group discussions,3).60 minutes group presentation.No breaks!时间表:30 分钟演讲,30 分钟分组讨论,60 分钟分组汇报演讲.没有中间休息!,Digital Library-the definition数字化图书馆定义,Definition of DL 数字化图书馆的定义No uniformed agreement!没有统一的说法!“真正的数字图书馆(1)绝不是简单的数字馆藏，(2)也不等于将图书馆流程乃至其部分或全部藏书数字化，(3)亦非网上资源的一个简单目录或一个工具书的电子版，(4)数字图书馆更不是以展示某一先进技术为目的的一个产品。”(曾蕾 张甲 杨宗英,情报学报2000,No.1)“数字图书馆的概念并不仅仅是一个有着信息管理工具的数字收藏的等价词，数字图书馆更是一个环境，它将收藏、服务、和人带到一起以 支持数据、信息、乃至知识的全部流程，包括从创造、传播、使用、到保存的全过程”(NSF“分散式知识工作环境”专题讨论 http:/www.si.umich.edu/SantaFe/),DL Definition on GoogleGoogle上的数字化图书馆的定义,Digital Library-the definition数字化图书馆定义(Cond),For tonights discussion 今天讨论中的数字化图书馆的定义A digital library comprises digital collections,services and infrastructure to support lifelong learning,research,scholarly communication and preservation.(wikipedia)数字化图书馆有数字化的馆藏、服务和基础结构组成，它为终身的学习、研究、学术交流和保存提供支持。,About Case Study 关于案例分析,A few words about Case Study method?简介案例分析的方法What is case study method 什么是案例分析方法？How the case study method benefit learning 案例分析方法如何帮助我们学习？Major components of case study 案例分析的要素How is this case study structured?案例分析是如何组成的？,About Case Study(Cond)关于案例分析,Some“ground rules”for case studies discussion 案例分析讨论一些“原则”Life is full of ambiguity and incompleteness 生活充满了模糊性和不完整性Just it is in print or someone said,it does not mean it is true!即使是出版的或者是别人说过的，并不意味着那就是正确的！There is no“right”or“wrong”answer,but there is a“best”explained answer.没有“正确”或者“错误”的答案，只有解释最完美的答案。The difference between“guess”and“estimate”“猜想”和“估计”之间的区别When it is in doubt,use your common sense,and follow your guts!当疑惑不定的时候,相信你的常识与胆略!Be prepared to defend your ideas 准备好为你的观点辩护,About SWOT Analysis关于SWOT分析,Todays case JHU library technologies integration 今天的案例约翰 霍普金斯大学图书馆的技术整合,Johns Hopkins University 约翰 霍普金斯大学Hopkins libraries 霍普金斯大学图书馆Libraries technology environment 图书馆的技术环境Systems 系统部门LDP(Library Digital Program)数字化图书馆项目部CER(Center for Educational Resources)教育资源中心 ULC 大学图书馆馆长委员会HILTs(Hopkins Integrated Library Technology and Service)ITJH 约翰 霍普金斯大学信息技术中心External 外界的技术资源,Libraries Stakeholders 图书馆的利益相关者,Sheridan Libraries Stakeholders 肖瑞丹图书馆的利益相关者Faculty/Staff 教职员工Students 学生Alumni 校友Trustees 董事会Donors 资助者Other academic libraries 其他高校图书馆,Sheridans Major DL Initiatives 主要的数字化图书馆项目,Systems projects 系统部门的项目ILS(Horizon)SFX/MetaLib HERMES(home-grow ERM software)SiteExecutive CMSHopkins Student Portal(uPortal)RAUL,VPN,EZProxy and Shibboleth JIRA/Confluence tracking softwareBlog,Wiki,Elluminate,Skype,and IMLDPs projects 数字化图书馆项目部的项目Digital services(e.g.ArcIMS map software,ETDs)Digital collections(e.g.Historical Baltimore Census,The Lester S.Levy Collection of Sheet Music)Digital Knowledge Center(e.g.Comprehensive Access to Printed Materials(CAPM);Archive Ingest and Handling Test(AIHT),Major DL Initiatives(Cond)主要的数字化图书馆项目,CERs projects 教育资源中心 的项目In class room votingWeb CT,Blackboard and SakaiInteractive MapTechnology fellowship programTA trainingITJH projects 约翰 霍普金斯大学信息技术中心的项目SSO with SiteMinderEnterprise Directory(JHED)Student Information SystemsHopkinsOne($200 million project with SAP),Whats the problem?问题是什么?,Sheridan Libraries technology organization 肖瑞丹图书馆的技术组织University IT(3 units)vs.Library IT 学校IT 部门和图书馆的IT部门IT infrastructure:信息技术的基础结构Hardware:mixed Unix/Linux/Windows/Macs 硬件:包括Unix/Linux/Windows/Macs多种系统 Software:ILS,CMS,Portal,Instructional,courseware,and desktop technologies 软件:图书馆信息系统,Single sign-on(SSO)and Identity Management 单一登陆（SSO)和用户认证管理Access interface,e.g OPAC,Portal,Federated Search,etc 用户界面，例如门户服务，联合搜索，等等Repositories:IR,Catalog,and others 信息库:学校信息库,图书馆目录,以及其他The“devil”is at the integration!困难在于如何整合,Problems(Cond)问题是什么?,Single Sign-On(SSO)单一登陆（SSO)Only to partial library application 仅仅适用于一部分图书馆的应用Authentication vs.Authorization,e.g.Shibboleth 缺损授权，例如Shibboleth Portal门户服务Not yet becoming the“entrance”to all library resources.Difficulty to do so as commercial software does not usually provide API 还没有真正成为所有图书馆资源的“门户”，困难在于商业软件通常没有提供API。Repositories 信息库Data is everywhere,and single repository is still a dream 信息无处不在，统一的信息库仍然是一个梦想。Strong researches,weak applications 理论联系实际脱节,Options 可能采取的方法,Option 1:total integration 方法一：全部整合Option 2:partial integration 方法二：部分整合Option 3:disparate system 方法三：分散系统Option 4:virtual integration方法四：虚拟整合Option 5:do nothing!方法五：啥也不做!,Recommendations 建议(Template),Statement of option 列出可能的方法Stakeholder analysis 利益相关者的分析Pros vs.Cons 优势和劣势Cost factors analysis成本因素和财政分析Policies analysis 政策分析Staffing analysis 员工分析Access,usability and accessibility analysis 获取，可用性以及可获取性的分析Tech infrastructure analysis 技术基础结构分析Technology standards analysis 技术标准分析Preservation analysis 长期保存分析,Sample Case Questions,What are the internal supporting factors Sheridan Libraries possess in supporting DL initiatives?关于支持数字化图书馆项目，肖瑞丹图书馆拥有什么内在支持的资源？What are major technologies integration problems with Hopkins libraries?What is the key problem,and why?霍普金斯图书馆有什么主要的技术整合的问题？最主要的问题是什么，为什么？What are possible external supporting factors for Sheridan Libraries DL initiative?肖瑞丹图书馆又有什么可能的外在因素来支持数字化图书馆项目?,Group Assignment小组活动,Lets divide the large group into four groups according following topics:按照下面的论题分成 4 组进行讨论:1).Strategy,staffing,funding and management 战略,员工,资金和管理2).Technology infrastructure:hardware,software,preservation,etc 技术基础结构:硬件,软件,长期保存,等等3).Standard and policy:metadata,interoperability,etc.标准和政策:元数据,互通性,等等4).Public access and discovery:interface,search,usability etc.公众获取与查询:界面,搜索,可访性,等等You choose which group youd like to join by selecting which topic you are mostly interested 你可以根据你最感兴趣的论题来选择你想参加小组,进行讨论.,Group Assignment(Cond)小组活动,Elect a discussion facilitator,and a note taker for each group 请每组选出一个讨论的组织者,和一个记录员Use the recommendation template and case study questions,but not limited to them 参考问题,但不要局限于此.Summarize recommendation and report back to large group with a group presentation 总结建议,并向大家汇报.,Facilitators Responsibility 讨论组织者的职责,Encourage maximal participation 鼓励大家积极参与Stay neutral,dont dominate the discussion 保持中立,不用主导讨论Control time and ask people to“shut up”if it is needed 控制时间,并且在需要的时候中止别人的发言Ensure note is taken 保证笔记的记录Conduct an election on final report presentation team 主持选举出最后汇报的人选Organize final group presentation and recommendations 组织最后的汇报讲演和建议,Example of Action-oriented Plan以行动为主的计划的例子,Goal/objective目标/方针Stakeholder analysis利益相关者分析Library resource analysis 图书馆资源分析Major project milestones/deliverables 主要项目的里程碑和成果Funding sources and major cost factors 资金来源和主要的成本因素Estimated timeframe(in month for this case)估计的时间框架(在该案例中按月来计算)Evaluation,assessment and measurement 评估和测量Leadership and members of implementation team(list positions)领导和实施小组的成员(请列出人员职位)Assign responsive parties to tasks 给负责的相关人士布置任务,Group Presentation小组汇报,Each group will give 15 minutes presentation.每组有15分钟的讲演时间.You should avoid having only one person to talk.Split tasks,have more speakers!避免只有一个人来讲演.让更多的人来汇报,将任务分配好.You should leave half of your time for Q&A.留下一半的时间给大家提问.,Now its time to do your work!现在大家开始小组活动!,