欢迎来到三一办公! | 帮助中心 三一办公31ppt.com(应用文档模板下载平台)
三一办公
全部分类
  • 办公文档>
  • PPT模板>
  • 建筑/施工/环境>
  • 毕业设计>
  • 工程图纸>
  • 教育教学>
  • 素材源码>
  • 生活休闲>
  • 临时分类>
  • ImageVerifierCode 换一换
    首页 三一办公 > 资源分类 > PPT文档下载  

    FDA产品质量的风险评估原则.ppt

    • 资源ID:5430729       资源大小:562.50KB        全文页数:49页
    • 资源格式: PPT        下载积分:15金币
    快捷下载 游客一键下载
    会员登录下载
    三方登录下载: 微信开放平台登录 QQ登录  
    下载资源需要15金币
    邮箱/手机:
    温馨提示:
    用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)
    支付方式: 支付宝    微信支付   
    验证码:   换一换

    加入VIP免费专享
     
    账号:
    密码:
    验证码:   换一换
      忘记密码?
        
    友情提示
    2、PDF文件下载后,可能会被浏览器默认打开,此种情况可以点击浏览器菜单,保存网页到桌面,就可以正常下载了。
    3、本站不支持迅雷下载,请使用电脑自带的IE浏览器,或者360浏览器、谷歌浏览器下载即可。
    4、本站资源下载后的文档和图纸-无水印,预览文档经过压缩,下载后原文更清晰。
    5、试题试卷类文档,如果标题没有明确说明有答案则都视为没有答案,请知晓。

    FDA产品质量的风险评估原则.ppt

    1,Risk Assessment Principles for the Product Quality Initiatives,H.Gregg Claycamp,Ph.D.,CHPCenter for Veterinary MedicineOffice of New Animal Drug EvaluationJune 25,2003,2,Outline,Overall Premise and QuestionsBasics of Risk AnalysisPossible Stages of Risk Assessments for PQ InitiativesRisk Ranking Model for a PQ Initiative?Pilot ScaleConclusions,The opinions and ideas presented here are those of the author and do not represent policy or opinion of the FDA.This material is intended for discussion purposes only.,3,Premise:Links Among Process(GMP)Risks and Patient Risks are Lost,RISK,Process Inspection Risks,cGMP,Correlations?Models?,4,Goal:Re-Link cGMP(PQ)Risks with Actual Risks to the Patient,RISK,Process Inspection Risks,RISK,Quality(Patient)Factors,cGMP,Patient,5,The Question,Can Risk Management theory,tools,practice and philosophy be employed to re-link risks to the patient with the risks identified,perceived or otherwise implicated in product quality terms?How can we share a common language about risk,risk management,and science-based decision making so that we can focus on developing a high-quality risk management model for product quality?,6,Getting Started,What theories,tools and lessons learned in risk analysis can help address these questions?Given the need for a significant shift in the approach to risk management,how do we begin the change process?Are there off-the-shelf models and tools that might be used,i.e.,at a pilot-scale?What kinds of RM processes can be used to foster changes needed both the regulatory and industrial spheres?,7,Basic Risk Analysis,8,Starting with the Some Basics,Risk is intuitive and familiar to everyone,yet few among us define risk carefully and formally enough for complex risk analysis.,9,Risk=“exposure to a chance of loss”(or,Risk=“chance of losing something we value”),Risk=Hazard x Exposure,RiskConsequence=Hazard x Exposure,10,Contemporary Risk Analysis,Includes four major activities:Hazard IdentificationRisk Assessment Risk ManagementRisk Communication,11,Risk Assessment Precedes Risk Management,Risk assessment is not a single process,but“a systematic approach to organizing and analysing scientific knowledge and information”to support a risk decision.NRC(1994)Various paradigms exist for the execution of a risk assessment in public health;however,all paradigms have in common fundamental scientific principles.,12,Risk Assessment Asks:,What can go wrong?What is the likelihood it would go wrong?What are the consequences?,13,Risk Management Asks:,What can be done?What options are available?What are risk trade-offs in terms of risks,benefits and costs?What are the impacts of current management decisions on future options?,14,Roles/Tasks(-short list),Pose the risk question.Charge the Risk Assessors with the Risk Assessment Task.Convene stake holders.Analyze decision options.Make/recommend the decision.,Identify data and gather information on the nature,extent,magnitude and uncertainty of the risk.Write the Risk Assessment.Recommends changes to RM questions.,Risk Managers,Risk Assessors,15,Risk Assessments,Regulatory Policy Risk Assessment:(e.g.,Biotechnology RA to determine the need for risk management regulation.)Applied Risk Assessment:To determine compliance with a regulation or policy.Safety Assessments:Highly defined risk calculations.Usually under a“bright line”safety policy.,16,Safety vs.Risk,17,Risk Analysis in a Democracy,Risk assessments provide the“facts”for risk analysis.,Risk,Risk,Risk,Risk,Risk,Risk,Risk,18,Risk Analysis in a Democracy,The risk management decisions about which risks to manage are value-laden decisions.,Worst,Risk Management Rank,19,Translating Risk Analytic Paradigms,Risk Analysis,Risk Assessment Release Assessment Exposure Assessment Consequence Assessment Risk Estimation,Risk Management,Risk Communication,Hazard Identification,20,Possible Stages of Risk Assessment for Work Planning,21,Hazard Identification,What can go wrong?Identify hazards:events Identify hazardous agents(chemical,biological,physical)How severe are the potential consequences?Given the event occurs,is the consequence catastrophic?Mildly annoying?How likely are the events to occur?Essentially a crude risk estimate for initial prioritization purposes.,22,Exposure Assessment,Release Assessment:How“much”of the hazardous event occurs?Example:Does a“non-sterile”event involve 1 or 10,000 vials?Pathway analysis:If the hazardous event occurs,what pathways are there that expose humans to the hazard?Extent of exposure:If a hazardous event occurs,how many people are potentially exposed?,23,GMP Failure(Release)Assessment,How frequent are the identified PQ events(hazards)?Boundary of release?Process line,plant,warehouse,distributor?Release rates(“PQ Faults”)are obtained in fault tree assessments,empirically,historical data,expert analyses.Example:FMEA,24,Consequence Assessment*,Given exposure to the hazardous event/agent,what is the likelihood of harm under a pre-defined endpoint?Endpoint examples:DeathIllnessWorryOAI*A.K.A.“Dose-Response Assessment”(see next slide),25,Consequence Assessment,Quantity of contamination(“non-sterility”)i.e.,in“bacteria counts per vial”,Proportion of exposed persons who become ill,100%,50%,0%,26,Qualitative Consequence Assessment,High,Medium,Low,Relative Effect/Impact,Low,Medium,High,(Exposure or Dose Metric),27,Risk Estimation,Bring together the information about the hazard,the extent of exposure to the hazard,the consequences of exposures,and thenestimate the risk.Includes a critical analysis of uncertainty in both the data and risk assessment models.,28,Uncertainties in Risk Assessment,UNCERTAINTY,Knowledge,Variability,DataParametersModel,TemporalSpatialInter-individual,29,Conceptual Models for RM in PQ Initiative,30,The PQ Risk Management Problem,Diverse PQ failure(hazards)are identified.Wide-ranging risk(=chance that exposure to the hazard will result in harm adverse outcome).Wide-ranging consequences(death to worry).Quantitative risk analysis hazard-by-hazard too vast an undertaking.Ranking of risks for re-linking worst PQ risks with worst health risks,etc.,How can we objectively rank“apples and oranges”among the“potatoes and beans?”,31,From the Beginning,Is risk analysis for each hazard independentlyfeasible?,32,Fault Trees for each process?,33,Faults Magnified N-fold for a Simple Manufacturing Process,34,Decision Analyses for Each Hazard Multiplies Complexity!,e.g.,35,Solution?A Multifactor Approach to PQ Risk Management,Multifactor methods already exist.Some tools(software)already developed.Appropriately-scaled approach to the question,the data quality,the nature of the decision,and the understanding of the overall process.,36,State the Assumptions,E.g.,assume that health risks were linked to PQ“compliance risks”previously,i.e.,the historical basis of regulation.Historically based assumption:compliance Health risk qualityGiven the assumption,can GMP“compliance risk”be modeled as a surrogate of health risk?,37,Identify the PQ Failures(Hazards),What can go wrong?Top level organization of hazards:Health|Compliance|Resources|Sociopolitical Second level(detail)organization:Sterility(microbial contamination)Dose(formulation)Toxicity(chemical contamination)Physical hazards(physical contamination/defect)Fine detail:“risk factor”event descriptors.,38,Sort the Hazards/Risks by Major Categories,Start with assumptions.State questions to be answered.Sort under the questions.Re-sort if new patterns emerge.For example,(next slide),39,Organizing a Multi-factorial Risk Model,40,Focused Multi-factorial Risk Model,41,Risk factors for a given endpoint,42,Estimate the Prevalence,The prevalence of inspection findings for a given type of event are initial estimates of probabilities necessary for risk management modeling.Failure analysis“in plant.”Failure in compliance inspections.Human adverse events.,43,For each hazard,44,The modelers view(for example),45,For each hazard,46,Scoring,then prioritize multiple hazards,PQ Fault APQ Fault TPQ Fault CPQ Fault DPQ Fault XPQ Fault M,Scored and Prioritized,47,Risk Ranking&Filtering Model,Health,Compliance,Other,(Risk Ranking and Filtering),48,Risk Analysis Cycle,Multi-Factorial Risk Model,Risk Ranking and Filtering,Work Planning,cGMP/Compliance Inspections,Assessments(Data Bases),Start,49,Conclusions,Risk Assessment provides a process for organizing information in support of risk-based decision making.Risk assessment is one of the tools available for Risk Management,the activity in which the options for controlling risks are examined in light of costs,benefits and risk trade-offs.Multifactor Risk Ranking and filtering approach might be robust enough to employ in the GMP Initiative.,

    注意事项

    本文(FDA产品质量的风险评估原则.ppt)为本站会员(小飞机)主动上传,三一办公仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知三一办公(点击联系客服),我们立即给予删除!

    温馨提示:如果因为网速或其他原因下载失败请重新下载,重复下载不扣分。




    备案号:宁ICP备20000045号-2

    经营许可证:宁B2-20210002

    宁公网安备 64010402000987号

    三一办公
    收起
    展开