外文翻译汽车后底板的冲压模具设计分析英文版.doc

JournalELSEVIERMaterials Processing TechnologyJournal of Materials Processing Technology 55 (1995) 408-416:Analysis of die designs for the stamping of an automobile rear floor panelFuh-Kuo Chen Corresponding author., Jia-Hong LiuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC Received 10 October 1994Industrial summaryThe stamping process of manufacturing a one-piece rear floor panel of a passenger car has been investigated in the present study. An analysis of the original die design, in which a split defect occurred at the drawn-cup wall, was performed using circle-grid analysis as well as the 3-D finite-element method. The split defect is due to the large area of sheet metal under the blank-holder that limits the flow of the metal towards the cup area. An optimum die design，which consists of a separate die face and a wedge mechanism mounted in the lower die frame, was proposed to provide additional metal for the cup area and to eliminate the split defect without adding an extra operation. This optimum die design was validated by the results of circle-grid analysis performed for the first and second draw operations and also by the good-quality panels produced.Keywords: Stamping dies; Rear floor panel; Splits; Circle-grid analysis.0924-0136/96/S 15.00 © 1996 Elsevier Science S.A. All rights reserved SSDI 0924-01 36(95)02038-N1. IntroductionSplits are amongst the major defects occurring commonly in the stamping process. A lot of research effort has been made to investigate the causes of and solutions to the split problem during the last few decades 1-4, the methods used including forming-limit analysis and the finite-element method. Since Keeler and Backofen 5 first introduced the concept of forming-limit diagrams (FLDs) in 1963, they have been used widely in the analysis of sheet metal forming in press shops. The FLDs indicate the strains which lead to failure and thus provide a useful tool to determine if the forming process is likely to be prone to splitting, whilst the finite-element method can calculate the strain distributions in the stamped parts accurately and thus predict if the split defect is likely to occur.In general, the solution to problems of splitting is to provide more metal to the critical area before the major drawing process starts. This can be achieved either by decreasing the blank-holder pressure or improving the lubrication conditions, but the most straight-forward method is to add an extra operation solely for the purpose of feeding more metal into the critical area.However, the extra operation increases the production cost by adding one more set of dies and additional man-power; and hence in reality, it should be avoided.In the present study，an optimum die design in which a separate die face and a wedge mechanism mounted in the lower die frame is proposed to eliminate the occurrence of a split-defect in the stamping process for a one- piece floor panel of a passenger car. The special die face and wedge mechanism were designed to provide additional metal for the critical area where the split defect occurred, without adding an extra operation. Both circle- grid analysis and 3-D finite-element simulations were performed to analyze this split defect.2. Problem descriptionThe common design for a rear floor panel of a passenger car is usually a two-piece type, namely, welding two stamped pieces together, as shown in Fig. 1. The two- piece type design is chosen mainly due to the difficulty encountered in stamping a one-piece rear floor panel, in which a split tends to take place at the wall of the deeply drawn cup used for storing the spare tire, as shown in Fig. 2. The occurrence of the split is attributed to the substantial distance between the cup wall and one side of the blank-holder, as shown by line A-B in Fig. 3, thatrestricts the metal under the blank-holder from flowing into the cup area. Whilst in the two-piece design this distance is much shorter and sufficient metal can flow easily into the cup to prevent the edge of the cup from splitting，due to cost-effective considerations, a one-piece rear floor panel is always desired, so that the split problem must therefore be overcome.The original procedure in the press shop for the production of the one-piece rear floor panel consists of four operations: first draw, second draw, trimming, and flanging. The first-draw operation was designed only to produce a cup shape, as shown in Fig. 3. As for the ribs around the cup, these were formed in the second-draw operation. Like most stamping processes, the main deformation of the rear floor panel is completed in the first- draw operation. The conventional draw process allows the punch to pull more metal into the die cavity from the blank-holder. To facilitate metal-flow, no draw beads were employed on the blank-holder surface. However, due to the large draw depth and the geometric difficulty mentioned above, a split was still found at the cup wall near the bottom after the first-draw operation, as shown in Fig. 2. The location of the split defect indicates that the considerable distance between one side of the cup wall and the blank-holder does prevent the metal from flowing towards the cup. Some efforts have been made to help the metal to flow toward the cup area. The attempt of decreasing the blank-holder pressure led to more wrinkles at the root of the cup area but without eliminating the split. Improvement of the sheet metal quality was also proven to be in vain. Extreme care taken with the lubrication conditions can ease the split problem: however, this is not cost-effective for the process of mass production. Also the large quantity of lubrication oil used in the stamping process may pollute the shop floor. Hence, the most efficient way left to solve this problem is to provide more metal for the cup area before the punch starts to form the cup. To achieve this end, modification of the blank-holder surface to form a better binder-wrap shape which provides more metal around the cup area was considered. The binder-wrap is the deformed shape of the sheet-blank at the closure of the blank-holders. However, due to the same geometrical reason, i.e. the considerable distance between the cup and one side of the blank-holder, the optimum blank-holder surface is not easy to obtain. Finally, a separate die face designed for the first-draw operation aided by a special wedge mechanism mounted in the lower die frame provided more metal for the cup area and enabled the production of sound products without split defects.3. Analysis of the original designThe problem of splitting is usually related to the strain distribution in the critical area. The strain distribution in any cross section of the formed part is determined by two factors: one is the amount of metal-flow resulting from draw-in over the blank-holder; the other is the amount of stretch created by the contacts between the punch and the die 6. To quantify the effect of the tooling geometry on the metal flow, the original design was analyzed by circle-grid analysis (CGA) and the finite-element method (FEM).TRUE STRAINFig. 4. The stress-strain curve for the sheet-blank.3.1. Circle-grid analysisCircle grid analysis has been used widely in the press shop to measure the strain distributions and thus to enable an analysis of the formability of the sheet metal by plotting the measured strains on the forming-limit diagram. The circle grids have a major advantage over the other types of grid, such as square grids, since they do not have any preferred orientations. This advantage lies in that the deformation of the circles will result in ellipses, the two principal directions being displayed clearly by the major and minor axes. The magnitudes of the principal strains can then be calculated from the measurements of the lengths of the major and minor axes. By plotting these measured major and minor strains on the forming limit diagram, the severity of areas of a formed part can be evaluated.In the present study, a production fioor-panel made using the original die design was first analyzed with circle-grid analysis. The steel sheet used for production is 0.7 mm thick and of DDQ quality, with material properties as shown in Fig. 4. The corresponding forming-limit diagram for this material provided by the steel supplier is shown by the solid curve in Fig. 5. Any area of a formed part which is deformed with the strains located on or close to this curve will tend to split. In practice, the forming-limit curve shifted down by 10%，as shown by the dashed line in Fig. 5, is used as the design curve. The area above the forming limit curve is called the failure zone; the area between the forming-limit curve and the design curve is termed the marginal zone; and the area below the design curve is named the safe zone. In general, the strain distributions in any area of a formed part should fall in the safe zone to make the stamping process stable, a stamping process being said to be stable if it is less sensitive to process variations.Before being stamped, the critical area of the sheet- blank was imprinted with 5-mm diameter circles with 6-mm spacing between their centres. To imprint the circles the critical area of the sheet-blank was first cleaned using a special cleaner, then a stencil with the correct grid pattern was placed in position on the part. Using the electrolyte as conductor, the area covered by the stencil was marked with the grid pattern by an etching process. To prevent the marked area from rusting, a piece of cloth saturated with cleaner was used to wipe off excess electrolyte and residual oxides in the marks.After being stamped, a split was found on the cup wall near to the top, as shown in Fig. 2. The major and minor strains of the deformed circles around the split, as shown in Fig. 6，were measured and plotted on the forming limit diagram, as shown in Fig. 7. As can be seen in this figure, the measured strains are either above or close to theFig. 6. Deformed circles on the sheet-blank.-30-25-20-15-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Minor Strain (。/。）Fig. 7. Measured strains around the split.05 o 5 0505050505050 9 8 8 7 7665544332211B.Eous Joos:-30-25-20-15-10-5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 AO Minor Strain (°/0)Fig. 5. The forming-limit diagram for 0.7 mm DDQ steel sheet.0 5 0 5 0505050505050 9 8 8 7 76655/H/H332211() uois Joowforming-limit curve, and the failure is obviously due to stretching, since both the major and minor strains are positive. It is also noted that the strains are very close to the plane-strain failure mode, i.e., close to the axis on which the minor strain is zero.The results of the circle-grid analysis indicate that the original design is very unstable. The FLD also indicates that the major strain is too large: this is consistent with the present authors' opinion that the considerable distance between the cup and one side of the blank-holder limits the flow of metal towards the cup area, resulting in the large strains. As discussed in the previous sections， the most effective method of decreasing the major strain is to provide more metal for the cup area.3.2. Finite element analysisTo help further understanding of the deformation of the sheet-blank during the stamping process, a 3-D finite- element analysis was performed for the first-draw operation of the original design. The explicit finite-element code PAM-STAMP, which is capable of handling any arbitrary 3-D die shapes，was used to conduct the simulations. Since the 3-D die geometries, including the punch, the die cavity, the blank-holder and the draw beads, are not simplified, the finite-element program is able to simulate the actual production processes more accurately.In order to describe the geometry of the die components, a commercial CAD program was used to construct the surface models for these components. The mesh systems required by PAM-STAMP as the input data for the die geometries were then generated by the same commercial CAD program, as shown in Fig. 8. In earlier periods, it was very difficult，if not impossible, to generate the mesh system for a complicate 3-D die shape, such as the stamping dies. However, as CAD systems are being used with increasing popularity in the die and mould industry， the above procedures to generate the mesh systems for the die geometries become trivial. Since the PAM- STAMP code treats the die components as rigid bodies, the mesh systems are used only to describe the geometriespunchsheet-blankFig. 8. Mesh system forthe original die design.of these components and not for stress analysis. In the present investigation, a mixture of 3-node triangular and 4-node rectangular elements is used to construct the mesh systems. The mesh system for the sheet-blank is also shown in Fig. 8. As seen in this figure, the mesh density is much higher in the cup area than elsewhere, since the cup area is the location where splitting occurs. The numbers of elements used in the analysis are summarized as follows: die: 9,910; punch: 5,499; blank-holder: 4,411; sheet: 4,891; total: 24,711.The material properties used for the finite-element analysis are the same as those given in the previous section, the other operational conditions being: blank- holder pressure: 57 kPa; punch velocity: 10 m/s; punch stroke: 895 mm; and coefficient of friction: 0.12. The CPU time spent on an HP735 work-station to run a single job is about 11 100 s, the simulation results being displayed on an SGI work-station.One of the advantages of using finite-element analysis for stamping process is that the deformed shape of the sheet-blank can be monitored throughout the stamping process, which is not possible in the real production process. Amongst the deformed shapes, the binder-wrap is the most interesting to the die designer, since it can be used to determine if the blank-holder surface has been designed properly. In the present study, the main purpose of the finite-element analysis is to investigate the deformation of the sheet-blank and the location where the split is most likely to occur. Hence, the deformed shape and the thickness contour obtained from the finite-ele- ment simulations were investigated.The deformed mesh is shown in Fig. 9. As seen in this figure, the cup is formed without causing any wrinkling. As for the thickness contour shown in Fig. 10，the darker area represented the thinner portion of the steel sheet. It can be seen from this figure that the thinnest portion is at the cup wall near to the bottom: this location agrees with that found in the production panel. In addition, the distribution of the major and minor principal strains around the thinnest portion obtained from the finite-element simulation, as shown in Fig. 11, is very consistent with that foun