gre写作考试备考资料简介.doc

gre写作考试备考资料简介 gre写作考试一直是很多学子的心头大事，如何做好gre写作备考?下面就和大家分享gre写作考试备考资料简介，希望能够帮助到大家，来欣赏一下吧。gre写作考试备考资料简介gre写作备考1. 对于时间充裕的同学gre写作资料中的高频是出现频率高的作文,没有人能保证考时一定遇到高频题. 如果还有不少时间,建议不要放弃任何一道题, 很多经验证明了，很多考生都有可能遇到有史以来第一次考到的ISSUE和ARGU题, 所以什么事情都是有可能发生的(就好象指出ARGU里的逻辑错误一样)2. 对于时间不那么充裕的同学如何利用gre写作考试准备ISSUE。建议准备出现频率最高的40道ISSUE,注意这里指的频率指的是近两年的总频率,不分时间地域,同时加上本月本地出现3次以上的ISSUE题(大部分已经包括在前40道里,因此需要另外准备的不多).拿我个人来说,我在北京考,考前准备了总频超过30次的38道ISSUE(3.8备考资料的数据,现在可能有更新)+5至6道北京3月出现3次以上同时未包括在这38道中的题,考试时遇到的两道 177,141分别出现39,38次,均为高频。就我考前从各种渠道了解的信息，绝大部分人考时遇到一道频数大于30的可能性是相当大的。(也许有人会说很多人并没有来报备考资料，我的数据不一定可靠。这个就见仁见智了，我只是表达个人的建议，采纳与否，全是个人的自由.但无疑当考前时间不够时,准备出现机率较大的题目显然是特殊情况下的最佳选择了)如何利用gre作文备考资料准备ARGU。重要的是多熟悉题目,时间充裕的应该做到任何一道题都没有不认识的单词,不理解的语句,这样找错才能有的放矢.时间不够的,至少把考过10次以上的题目(约90多道) 加上本月本地出现过但未列入上述90多道的题目全过一遍,弄懂每一个单词.这很重要,否则考场上碰到关键单词不认识,加上紧张,可就傻眼了.拿我来说,考时遇到的是10几频的题,幸好考前晚上刚过了一遍,否则文中有两个单词都不认识,显然会很不爽.GRE写作满分范文赏析The?following?is?taken?from?a?memo?from?the?advertising?director?of?the?Silver?Screen?Movie?Production?Company.?"According?to?a?recent?report?from?our?marketing?department,?fewer?people?attended?movies?produced?by?Silver?Screen?during?the?past?year?than?in?any?other?year.?And?yet?the?percentage?of?generally?favorable?comments?by?movie?reviewers?about?specific?Silver?Screen?movies?actually?increased?during?this?period.?Clearly,?the?contents?of?these?reviews?are?not?reaching?enough?of?our?prospective?viewers;?so?the?problem?lies?not?with?the?quality?of?our?movies?but?with?the?publics?lack?of?awareness?that?movies?of?good?quality?are?available.?Silver?Screen?should?therefore?spend?more?of?its?budget?next?year?on?reaching?the?public?through?advertising?and?less?on?producing?new?movies."?The?advertising?director?of?Silver?Screen?should?lose?his?job.?It?is?clear?that?his?analysis?of?the?decrease?in?attendance?in?the?past?year?was?incomplete.?A?better?qualified?individual?might?have?explored?the?issue?further?by?doing?several?different?things.?First?of?all,?surveys?of?the?general?population?could?provide?a?clue?to?the?decreased?viewership.?They?may?find?that?people?arent?as?willing?to?pay?the?high?prices?anymore.?A?survey?may?also?reveal?that?people?are?aware?of?Silver?Screen,?but?opt?not?to?see?the?films.?An?inspection?of?the?nature?of?the?films?made?by?Silver?Screen?could?also?hint?to?the?root?of?the?problem.?If?Silver?Screen?produces?a?lot?of?the?same?type?of?movie,?then?the?problem?may?be?that?they?dont?produce?enough?to?appeal?to?the?diverse?interests?of?the?population.?For?instance,?if?their?movies?typically?contain?excessive?violence?and?foul?language,?parents?wont?take?their?children?to?these?films.?That?is?a?significant?portion?of?the?potential?viewing?population?lost.?The?ad?director?mentions?that?reviewers?liked?specific?films?and?gave?more?favorable?reviews?than?in?the?past.?But?he?neglects?to?mention?the?specific?numbers-?critics?may?have?raved?about?2?movies?and?turned?their?thumbs?down?the?10?others.?If?thats?the?case,?its?no?wonder?that?viewership?has?declined.?Spending?more?on?advertising,?and?less?on?production,?as?the?ad?director?suggests,?could?drive?the?company?out?of?business.?If?the?media?builds?alot?of?hype?over?a?new?release?that?was?poorly?produced,?people?are?more?likely?to?be?disappointed,?and?skeptical?about?future?productions.?This?is?certainly?not?in?the?companys?best?interests.?What?is?in?the?companys?best?interest?is?a?broader?scope?of?the?problem,?and?different?approaches?to?solving?i?Commentary?This?strong?response?begins?with?an?attack?on?the?advertising?director?of?Silver?Screen?but?quickly?shifts?to?identifying?major?flaws?in?the?argument.?The?main?points?of?the?critique?are?that?-?the?real?reasons?for?a?decline?in?viewership?have?not?yet?been?identified;?-?Silver?Screen?may?not?produce?different?kinds?of?movies?to?appeal?to?diverse?interests;?-?the?number?of?favorably?reviewed?movies?may?actually?have?been?very?low;?and?-?spending?money?to?produce?a?possibly?poor?movie?could?hurt?rather than?help?the?company.?Although?more?points?are?made?here?than?are?made?in?the?sample?6?response?on?this?topic,?each?of?the?points?made?in?the?6?paper?is?developed.?That?is?not?the?case?here.?In?this?response,?each?point?is?supported?(by?perhaps?an?additional?sentence),?but?it?is?not?further?developed.?The?paper?is?smoothly?organized?with?few?but?appropriate?transitions.?The?writing?is?strong?with?some?variety?in?syntax.?For?these?reasons,?this?response?earns?a?score?of?5.GRE写作满分范文赏析The?following?is?taken?from?a?memo?from?the?advertising?director?of?the?Silver?Screen?Movie?Production?Company.?"According?to?a?recent?report?from?our?marketing?department,?fewer?people?attended?movies?produced?by?Silver?Screen?during?the?past?year?than?in?any?other?year.?And?yet?the?percentage?of?generally?favorable?comments?by?movie?reviewers?about?specific?Silver?Screen?movies?actually?increased?during?this?period.?Clearly,?the?contents?of?these?reviews?are?not?reaching?enough?of?our?prospective?viewers;?so?the?problem?lies?not?with?the?quality?of?our?movies?but?with?the?publics?lack?of?awareness?that?movies?of?good?quality?are?available.?Silver?Screen?should?therefore?spend?more?of?its?budget?next?year?on?reaching?the?public?through?advertising?and?less?on?producing?new?movies."?Although?the?reasoning?in?this?arguement?is?logical,?the?writer?failed?to?consider?other?reasons?for?the?disparity?between?the?percentage?of?people?attending?the?companys?movie?and?the?percentage?of?favorable?reviews.?Perhaps?the?fault?lies?with?the?reviewers?and?not?the?production?company;?the?public?may?not?trust?the?critics?reviews.?Another?posibility?for?the?attendance?drop?is?that?the?general?public?does?not?find?the?subject?matter?of?the?movies?enticing.?If?that?were?the?case,?spending?less?on?producing?new?movies?in?an?effort?to?re-direct?funds?to?advertising?could?backfire?by?further?limiting?the?types?of?movies?available?to?the?potential?audience.?Maybe?the?general?public?is?simply?not?impressed?with?the?critically-acclaimed?qualities?of?the?movies?(such?as?eloquent?screenplays,?artful?cinematography,?and?realistic?acting)?and?and?would?prefer?seeing?flashy?special?effects?and?big-name?stars.?The?possible?reasons?for?the?attendance?decline?are?numerous;?even?aspects?not?directly?related?to?the?movie?industry?(such?as?the?improving?quality?of?television?programming?and?the?increasing?popularity?of?home?computer?use)?may?play?large?roles.?The?companys?management?would?be?wise?to?consider?and?study?the?entire?realm?of?possibilities?before?making?drastic?changes?in?its?budget?based?on?one?statistical?discovery.?Commentary?This?response?identifies?and?analyzes?some?important?flaws?in?the?argument.?Although?the?number?of?points?mentioned?is?the?same?as?that?in?the?sample?5?paper,?this?response?remains?at?the?4?score?level?because?the?points?of?the?critique?are?only?minimally?developed?or?supported.?The?essay?identifies?four?points:?-?the?public?might?not?trust?critics?-?the?movies?subject?matter?might?not?be?appealing-?the?public?might?prefer?seeing?special?effects?or?big-name?stars?rather?than?good?cinematography?or?realistic?acting?-?perhaps?improvement?in?TV?programming?or?increased?use?of?home?computers?has?kept?people?away?from?movie?theaters?Ideas?in?the?response?are?conveyed?well?and?clearly;?the?use?of?language?is?generally?strong.?But?the?papers?"bare-bones"?analysis?gives?it?a?list-like?quality.?It?is?therefore?merely?adequate?and?merits?a?score?of?4.gre写作考试备考资料简介