GRE写作之评分须知.doc

GRE写作之评分须知 gre写作如何评分今天给大家带来GRE写作评分须知，希望能够帮助到大家，下面就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。GRE写作：评分须知(1) complexity:事物的两面性(同一事物有优点就有缺点，相比较的事物有各自的优缺点)，从多角度分析事物(分析不同领域中，不同情况下)。论点一边倒的*论述得再好也只能得5分。(2) insightful position：在有全面深刻理解的基础上，观点最好新颖独到(对ets来说)，但必须保证能自圆其说。(3) conveys meaning skillfully:可用于论证的一切技巧(估计老美自己用起来也得费点心思)。比如*的行文方向，起承转合不用明显的标志词(first, second, however, on the other hand, the second example illustrating my point)，而是依靠论述的内在脉络(只可意会不可言传)自然而然的引到下一块内容。(4) compelling reasons(reason就已经够令人头疼的了，有加了个compelling)：这是最重要的一个得分点。(5) persuasive examples：用来支持reason的，使抽象的reason更具体，更易被读者理解，从而产生共鸣，或使其更可信，更有说服力。可用的例子有自己的经历，引言。(6) well-focused:简单说就是不跑题。中心论点明确，全文不跑题;各段主题句明确，围绕主题句论述。(7) well-organized：*采用的论述结构，分几个部分论述，每部分有几段，各部分、各段间的关系是什么。(8) connecting ideas logically：using transitional phrases起承转合词，过渡句，或有此种作用的句子，总之起到help organize the ideas and move the argument forward。(9) 跟着感觉走没错。(10) 不要罗嗦，表达简洁。但如果以上几点做得好，这缺点可以忽略不计。(11) 基本上挺难，但不影响大局，为避免重复大胆的用你想用的词，阅卷人能理解。(12) sentence variety：最好长短句结合，ets藐视总用短句的人：Since most of the sentences are short and choppy, the ideas they try to communicate are also choppy.(13) 还有语法错误等等，小毛病，先把上面的问题解决好在理它吧。其他问题：.没有十分地把握，不要乱下定义，严重的损害议论文严谨的文风。.ets讨厌重复：不论是内容上还是形式上，总结也要做到避免重复有层次，先表面后深刻，先分段后整体。GRE写作满分范文赏析Six?months?ago?the?region?of?Forestville?increased?the?speed?limit?for?vehicles?traveling?on?the?regions?highways?by?ten?miles?per?hour.?Since?that?change?took?effect,?the?number?of?automobile?accidents?in?that?region?has?increased?by?15?percent.?But?the?speed?limit?in?Elmsford,?a?region?neighboring?Forestville,?remained?unchanged,?and?automobile?accidents?declined?slightly?during?the?same?six-month?period.?Therefore,?if?the?citizens?of?Forestville?want?to?reduce?the?number?of?automobile?accidents?on?the?regions?highways,?they?should?campaign?to?reduce?Forestvilles?speed?limit?to?what?it?was?before?the?increase.?When?we?compare?two?things,?we?like?to?put?them?on?the?same?background.?same?condition.?For?the?fact?given?above,?in?the?same?time,?foundmentally,?the?two?region?have?the?same?traffic?condition,?except,?the?speedlimit?is?improved?in?one,?and?the?other?keep?the?same.?So?we?can?get?the?result?that?the?reason?of?the?difference?is?that?the?improved?speed?limit.?And?also?the?change?will?give?some?other?inconvinent?to?the?people?there.?For?example,?the?people?will?not?familiar?with?the?change,?have?some?problem?in?handle?the?speed.?So,?what?I?think?is?that?the?citizen?should?show?the?government?the?statistic?number?of?the?difference.?Argue?with?them.?Comments:?This?response?is?fundamentally?deficient?as?a?critique?for?two?reasons:?-?although?the?writer?has?relied?heavily?on?the?language?of?the?topic,?it?is?clear?that?the?writer?has?no?real?control?of?language,?and?-?there?is?little?or?no?evidence?of?the?writers?ability?to?develop?an?organized?response.?GRE写作满分范文赏析Six?months?ago?the?region?of?Forestville?increased?the?speed?limit?for?vehicles?traveling?on?the?regions?highways?by?ten?miles?per?hour.?Since?that?change?took?effect,?the?number?of?automobile?accidents?in?that?region?has?increased?by?15?percent.?But?the?speed?limit?in?Elmsford,?a?region?neighboring?Forestville,?remained?unchanged,?and?automobile?accidents?declined?slightly?during?the?same?six-month?period.?Therefore,?if?the?citizens?of?Forestville?want?to?reduce?the?number?of?automobile?accidents?on?the?regions?highways,?they?should?campaign?to?reduce?Forestvilles?speed?limit?to?what?it?was?before?the?increase.?The?argument?gives?statistics?of?increases?in?automobile?accidents?since?the?speed?limit?increased?six?months?ago?on?the?highways?of?Forestville.?The?argument?also?gives?a?statement?of?how?the?neighboring?region?of?Forestville,?did?not?increase?or?decrease?the?speed?limit.?It?remained?unchanged?and?automobile?accidents?declined?slightly?during?the?same?six-month?period.?The?argument?may?appeal?to?those?who?have?been?effected?by?the?increase?in?accidents,?but?it?does?not?give?an?emotional?appeal?overall.?We?are?relying?on?the?authors?statistics?but?we?dont?know?where?they?came?from?and?if?they?are?reliable.?The?argument?needs?more?examples?and?illustrations?to?get?his?point?across?to?more?people.?It?is?suggested?that?the?citizens?of?Forestville?campaign?to?reduce?Forestvilles?speed?limit?to?what?it?was?before?the?increase,?but?it?is?usually?hard?to?start?a?campaign.?One?person?needs?to?take?action.?If?the?author?is?a?citizen?of?Forestville,?maybe?he?should?take?the?initiative.?Comments:?This?seriously?flawed?critique?presents?only?one?idea?relevant?to?an?analysis?of?the?argument:?"The?argument?needs?more?examples?and?illustrations?to?get?his?point?across?to?more?people."?Everything?else?in?the?essay?is?either?summarizing?the?argument,?speculating,?or?offering?advice.?The?result?is?a?response?that?is?clearly?on?topic?but?that?provides?no?analysis?of?the?line?of?reasoning?in?the?argument.?In?addition?to?the?lack?of?analysis,?the?writing?is?weak.?The?organization?is?loose,?although?not?illogical,?and?intended?meaning?is?sometimes?unclear?(e.g.,?"but?it?does?not?give?an?emotional?appeal?overall.").?For?these?reasons,?the?response?deserves?a?score?of?2?according?to?the?scoring?guide.